IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/joptap/v196y2023i1d10.1007_s10957-022-02136-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Convergence Rates for the Relaxed Peaceman-Rachford Splitting Method on a Monotone Inclusion Problem

Author

Listed:
  • Chee-Khian Sim

    (University of Portsmouth)

Abstract

We consider the convergence behavior using the relaxed Peaceman–Rachford splitting method to solve the monotone inclusion problem $$0 \in (A + B)(u)$$ 0 ∈ ( A + B ) ( u ) , where $$A, B: \Re ^n \rightrightarrows \Re ^n$$ A , B : ℜ n ⇉ ℜ n are maximal $$\beta $$ β -strongly monotone operators, $$n \ge 1$$ n ≥ 1 and $$\beta > 0$$ β > 0 . Under a technical assumption, convergence of iterates using the method on the problem is proved when either A or B is single-valued, and the fixed relaxation parameter $$\theta $$ θ lies in the interval $$(2 + \beta , 2 + \beta + \min \{ \beta , 1/\beta \})$$ ( 2 + β , 2 + β + min { β , 1 / β } ) . With this convergence result, we address an open problem that is not settled in Monteiro et al. (Computat Optim Appl 70:763–790, 2018) on the convergence of these iterates for $$\theta \in (2 + \beta , 2 + \beta + \min \{ \beta , 1/\beta \})$$ θ ∈ ( 2 + β , 2 + β + min { β , 1 / β } ) . Pointwise convergence rate results and R-linear convergence rate results when $$\theta $$ θ lies in the interval $$[2 + \beta , 2 + \beta + \min \{\beta , 1/\beta \})$$ [ 2 + β , 2 + β + min { β , 1 / β } ) are also provided in the paper. Our analysis to achieve these results is atypical and hence novel. Numerical experiments on the weighted Lasso minimization problem are conducted to test the validity of the assumption.

Suggested Citation

  • Chee-Khian Sim, 2023. "Convergence Rates for the Relaxed Peaceman-Rachford Splitting Method on a Monotone Inclusion Problem," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 196(1), pages 298-323, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:joptap:v:196:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1007_s10957-022-02136-6
    DOI: 10.1007/s10957-022-02136-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10957-022-02136-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10957-022-02136-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sedi Bartz & Minh N. Dao & Hung M. Phan, 2022. "Conical averagedness and convergence analysis of fixed point algorithms," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 82(2), pages 351-373, February.
    2. Renato D. C. Monteiro & Chee-Khian Sim, 2018. "Complexity of the relaxed Peaceman–Rachford splitting method for the sum of two maximal strongly monotone operators," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 70(3), pages 763-790, July.
    3. Damek Davis & Wotao Yin, 2017. "Faster Convergence Rates of Relaxed Peaceman-Rachford and ADMM Under Regularity Assumptions," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 42(3), pages 783-805, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ernest K. Ryu & Yanli Liu & Wotao Yin, 2019. "Douglas–Rachford splitting and ADMM for pathological convex optimization," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 74(3), pages 747-778, December.
    2. Sedi Bartz & Rubén Campoy & Hung M. Phan, 2022. "An Adaptive Alternating Direction Method of Multipliers," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 195(3), pages 1019-1055, December.
    3. Min Li & Zhongming Wu, 2019. "Convergence Analysis of the Generalized Splitting Methods for a Class of Nonconvex Optimization Problems," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 183(2), pages 535-565, November.
    4. Hedy Attouch & Zaki Chbani & Jalal Fadili & Hassan Riahi, 2022. "Fast Convergence of Dynamical ADMM via Time Scaling of Damped Inertial Dynamics," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 193(1), pages 704-736, June.
    5. Pauline Tan, 2018. "Linear Convergence Rates for Variants of the Alternating Direction Method of Multipliers in Smooth Cases," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 176(2), pages 377-398, February.
    6. Mauricio Romero Sicre, 2020. "On the complexity of a hybrid proximal extragradient projective method for solving monotone inclusion problems," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 76(3), pages 991-1019, July.
    7. Zamani, Moslem & Abbaszadehpeivasti, Hadi & de Klerk, Etienne, 2023. "The exact worst-case convergence rate of the alternating direction method of multipliers," Other publications TiSEM f30ae9e6-ed19-423f-bd1e-0, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    8. Renato D. C. Monteiro & Chee-Khian Sim, 2018. "Complexity of the relaxed Peaceman–Rachford splitting method for the sum of two maximal strongly monotone operators," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 70(3), pages 763-790, July.
    9. Naomi Graham & Hao Hu & Jiyoung Im & Xinxin Li & Henry Wolkowicz, 2022. "A Restricted Dual Peaceman-Rachford Splitting Method for a Strengthened DNN Relaxation for QAP," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 34(4), pages 2125-2143, July.
    10. Majela Pentón Machado & Mauricio Romero Sicre, 2023. "A Projective Splitting Method for Monotone Inclusions: Iteration-Complexity and Application to Composite Optimization," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 198(2), pages 552-587, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:joptap:v:196:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1007_s10957-022-02136-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.