IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/joptap/v116y2003i3d10.1023_a1023065319772.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Interior-Point Method for a Class of Saddle-Point Problems

Author

Listed:
  • B.V. Halldórsson

    (Informatics Research, Celera Genomics)

  • R.H. Tütüncü

    (Carnegie Mellon University)

Abstract

We present a polynomial-time interior-point algorithm for a class of nonlinear saddle-point problems that involve semidefiniteness constraints on matrix variables. These problems originate from robust optimization formulations of convex quadratic programming problems with uncertain input parameters. As an application of our approach, we discuss a robust formulation of the Markowitz portfolio selection model.

Suggested Citation

  • B.V. Halldórsson & R.H. Tütüncü, 2003. "An Interior-Point Method for a Class of Saddle-Point Problems," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 116(3), pages 559-590, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:joptap:v:116:y:2003:i:3:d:10.1023_a:1023065319772
    DOI: 10.1023/A:1023065319772
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1023/A:1023065319772
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1023/A:1023065319772?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yu. E. Nesterov & M. J. Todd, 1997. "Self-Scaled Barriers and Interior-Point Methods for Convex Programming," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 22(1), pages 1-42, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lara Dalmeyer & Tim Gebbie, 2021. "Geometric insights into robust portfolio construction," Papers 2107.06194, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2024.
    2. Shashank Oberoi & Mohammed Bilal Girach & Siddhartha P. Chakrabarty, 2019. "Can robust optimization offer improved portfolio performance?: An empirical study of Indian market," Papers 1908.04962, arXiv.org.
    3. Jose Blanchet & Lin Chen & Xun Yu Zhou, 2022. "Distributionally Robust Mean-Variance Portfolio Selection with Wasserstein Distances," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(9), pages 6382-6410, September.
    4. Thomas Schmelzer & Raphael Hauser, 2013. "Seven Sins in Portfolio Optimization," Papers 1310.3396, arXiv.org.
    5. Karthik Natarajan & Dessislava Pachamanova & Melvyn Sim, 2009. "Constructing Risk Measures from Uncertainty Sets," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 57(5), pages 1129-1141, October.
    6. Shashank Oberoi & Mohammed Bilal Girach & Siddhartha P. Chakrabarty, 2020. "Can Robust Optimization Offer Improved Portfolio Performance? An Empirical Study of Indian market," Journal of Quantitative Economics, Springer;The Indian Econometric Society (TIES), vol. 18(3), pages 611-630, September.
    7. Raphael Hauser & Vijay Krishnamurthy & Reha Tutuncu, 2013. "Relative Robust Portfolio Optimization," Papers 1305.0144, arXiv.org, revised May 2013.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chee-Khian Sim, 2019. "Interior point method on semi-definite linear complementarity problems using the Nesterov–Todd (NT) search direction: polynomial complexity and local convergence," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 74(2), pages 583-621, November.
    2. Sturm, J.F., 2001. "Avoiding Numerical Cancellation in the Interior Point Method for Solving Semidefinite Programs," Other publications TiSEM 949fb20a-a2c6-4d87-85ea-8, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    3. Robert Chares & François Glineur, 2008. "An interior-point method for the single-facility location problem with mixed norms using a conic formulation," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 68(3), pages 383-405, December.
    4. Terlaky, Tamas, 2001. "An easy way to teach interior-point methods," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 130(1), pages 1-19, April.
    5. Michael Orlitzky, 2021. "Gaddum’s test for symmetric cones," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 79(4), pages 927-940, April.
    6. G. Q. Wang & Y. Q. Bai, 2012. "A New Full Nesterov–Todd Step Primal–Dual Path-Following Interior-Point Algorithm for Symmetric Optimization," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 154(3), pages 966-985, September.
    7. G. Q. Wang & L. C. Kong & J. Y. Tao & G. Lesaja, 2015. "Improved Complexity Analysis of Full Nesterov–Todd Step Feasible Interior-Point Method for Symmetric Optimization," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 166(2), pages 588-604, August.
    8. E. A. Yıldırım, 2003. "An Interior-Point Perspective on Sensitivity Analysis in Semidefinite Programming," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 28(4), pages 649-676, November.
    9. Xiao-Kang Wang & Wen-Hui Hou & Chao Song & Min-Hui Deng & Yong-Yi Li & Jian-Qiang Wang, 2021. "BW-MaxEnt: A Novel MCDM Method for Limited Knowledge," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(14), pages 1-17, July.
    10. Héctor Ramírez & David Sossa, 2017. "On the Central Paths in Symmetric Cone Programming," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 172(2), pages 649-668, February.
    11. Vasile L. Basescu & John E. Mitchell, 2008. "An Analytic Center Cutting Plane Approach for Conic Programming," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 33(3), pages 529-551, August.
    12. Ximei Yang & Hongwei Liu & Yinkui Zhang, 2015. "A New Strategy in the Complexity Analysis of an Infeasible-Interior-Point Method for Symmetric Cone Programming," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 166(2), pages 572-587, August.
    13. G. Q. Wang & Y. Q. Bai & X. Y. Gao & D. Z. Wang, 2015. "Improved Complexity Analysis of Full Nesterov–Todd Step Interior-Point Methods for Semidefinite Optimization," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 165(1), pages 242-262, April.
    14. J.F. Sturm & S. Zhang, 1998. "On Sensitivity of Central Solutions in Semidefinite Programming," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 98-040/4, Tinbergen Institute.
    15. Mehdi Karimi & Levent Tunçel, 2020. "Primal–Dual Interior-Point Methods for Domain-Driven Formulations," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 45(2), pages 591-621, May.
    16. Changhe Liu & Hongwei Liu, 2012. "A new second-order corrector interior-point algorithm for semidefinite programming," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 75(2), pages 165-183, April.
    17. Behrouz Kheirfam, 2015. "A Corrector–Predictor Path-Following Method for Convex Quadratic Symmetric Cone Optimization," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 164(1), pages 246-260, January.
    18. Badenbroek, Riley & Dahl, Joachim, 2020. "An Algorithm for Nonsymmetric Conic Optimization Inspired by MOSEK," Other publications TiSEM bcf7ef05-e4e6-4ce8-b2e9-6, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    19. Renato D. C. Monteiro & Paulo R. Zanjácomo, 2000. "General Interior-Point Maps and Existence of Weighted Paths for Nonlinear Semidefinite Complementarity Problems," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 25(3), pages 381-399, August.
    20. Kuo-Ling Huang & Sanjay Mehrotra, 2017. "Solution of Monotone Complementarity and General Convex Programming Problems Using a Modified Potential Reduction Interior Point Method," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 29(1), pages 36-53, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:joptap:v:116:y:2003:i:3:d:10.1023_a:1023065319772. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.