IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jknowl/v14y2023i3d10.1007_s13132-021-00881-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

In Between New Public Management and Network Governance in Austria, Finland and Scotland: Potential Conflicts in Autonomy Understandings of Governments and Universities

Author

Listed:
  • Kajetan Stransky-Can

    (University of Vienna)

Abstract

The political science doctoral thesis project is focussing on comparing university policies with the background of different welfare state types: Austria as a conservative-corporatist, Finland as a social democratic and Scotland as a liberal welfare state. As universities are pre-constitutional entities, it seems to be legitimate to search for fit from welfare state policy-making with the practices of university steering. Here, I will present paradigm evidence of top-down-oriented New Public Management (NPM) and bottom-up-formed Network Governance (NG) at a macro-level, i.e. governance by the state. The paradigms connect with the theme of institutional autonomy, which differentiates into an academic, a financial, an organisational and a staffing aspect. As a result, I propose the following hypothesis for the cases of Austria, Finland and Scotland: NPM is present, but not dominant in higher education (HE) policies. More likely, NPM and NG appear simultaneously within the university policies of Austria, Finland and Scotland. How do these paradigms transfer within the institutions? In this article, a concept for this transfer of action in horizontal autonomy to actors in vertical autonomy through communication and through management committees’ interplay elaborates and, additionally, hypotheses formulate. The extent of the space for alternative paradigms to join the paradigm transfer game, for example, for Epistemic Governance (EG), might be larger, the higher the regulative density of university policies is. The borders of every paradigm in university policy, however, constitute with (a) strong welfare state traditions for governance and (b) strong university traditions for steering. Conservative-corporatist welfare state tradition as in Austria shows an inclination for university policy governance to be control-oriented, whereas social democratic welfare state tradition as in Finland relies on trust in university policy formulation (and implementation). It has to remain open how the liberal welfare state of Scotland would classify.

Suggested Citation

  • Kajetan Stransky-Can, 2023. "In Between New Public Management and Network Governance in Austria, Finland and Scotland: Potential Conflicts in Autonomy Understandings of Governments and Universities," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 14(3), pages 2742-2766, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:jknowl:v:14:y:2023:i:3:d:10.1007_s13132-021-00881-z
    DOI: 10.1007/s13132-021-00881-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13132-021-00881-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s13132-021-00881-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Elias G. Carayannis & David F. J. Campbell, 2021. "Democracy of Climate and Climate for Democracy: the Evolution of Quadruple and Quintuple Helix Innovation Systems," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 12(4), pages 2050-2082, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhisheng Chen, 2023. "Artificial Intelligence-Virtual Trainer: Innovative Didactics Aimed at Personalized Training Needs," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 14(2), pages 2007-2025, June.
    2. Alberto Ibanez & Ahmed AlRadaideh & Juan Antonio Jimber del Rio & Gyanendra Singh Sisodia, 2024. "Good Governance and Innovation: a Renewed Global Framework for National and Supranational Policy Advancement," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(2), pages 5794-5816, June.
    3. Bokolo Anthony Jnr. & Waribugo Sylva & Josue Kuika Watat & Sanjay Misra, 2024. "A Framework for Standardization of Distributed Ledger Technologies for Interoperable Data Integration and Alignment in Sustainable Smart Cities," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(3), pages 12053-12096, September.
    4. Joana Costa & Inês Amorim & João Reis & Nuno Melão, 2023. "User communities: from nice-to-have to must-have," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 1-35, December.
    5. Amzad Hossain & Ying Kong & Amjad Malik, 2023. "Remote learning during COVID-19 and transformative learning theory: tendency towards Quadruple Helix model for future post-secondary education in Indigenous contexts," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 1-31, December.
    6. Andréa Aparecida Costa Mineiro & Cleber Carvalho Castro & Marcelo Gonçalves do Amaral, 2024. "Who Are the Actors of Quadruple and Quintuple Helix? Multiple Cases in Consolidated Science and Technology Parks," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(1), pages 4691-4709, March.
    7. Mohammad Imtiaz Hossain & Mosab I. Tabash & May Ling Siow & Tze San Ong & Suhaib Anagreh, 2023. "Entrepreneurial intentions of Gen Z university students and entrepreneurial constraints in Bangladesh," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 1-34, December.
    8. Yan Zhang & Denise Tsang, 2023. "Knowledge and Innovation Within Chinese Firms in the Space Sector," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 14(3), pages 2905-2926, September.
    9. Hiroshi Ito & Kazuhiko Kato, 2025. "Redefining Toyota’s Woven City as a “glocal” innovation ecosystem for integrated sustainable development," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 1-22, December.
    10. Alice Villar & Stefania Paladini & Oliver Buckley, 2023. "Towards Supply Chain 5.0: Redesigning Supply Chains as Resilient, Sustainable, and Human-Centric Systems in a Post-pandemic World," SN Operations Research Forum, Springer, vol. 4(3), pages 1-46, September.
    11. Aleksandra Fedajev & Dejan Jovanović & Marina Janković-Perić & Magdalena Radulescu, 2025. "Exploring the Nexus of Distance Learning Satisfaction: Perspectives from Accounting Students in Serbian Public Universities During the Pandemic," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 16(1), pages 4465-4495, March.
    12. Matthias Keppel, 2023. "Political Control and Parliamentary Committees of Inquiry: Strengthening the Quality of Democracy," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 14(2), pages 1298-1320, June.
    13. Muhammad Rahim Ejaz, 2024. "Smart Manufacturing as a Management Strategy to Achieve Sustainable Competitiveness," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(1), pages 682-705, March.
    14. K. Śledzik & A. Szmelter-Jarosz & E. Kalpazidou Schmidt & K. Bielawski & A. Declich, 2023. "Are Schumpeter’s Innovations Responsible? A Reflection on the Concept of Responsible (Research and) Innovation from a Neo-Schumpeterian Perspective," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 14(4), pages 5065-5085, December.
    15. Bokolo Anthony Jnr., 2023. "Investigating the Decentralized Governance of Distributed Ledger Infrastructure Implementation in Extended Enterprises," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 14(4), pages 5003-5032, December.
    16. Assefa Tesfaye Hailu, 2024. "The role of university–industry linkages in promoting technology transfer: implementation of triple helix model relations," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 13(1), pages 1-17, December.
    17. Qi Yao & Hongjuan Tang & Francis Boadu & Yu Xie, 2023. "Digital Transformation and Firm Sustainable Growth: The Moderating Effects of Cross-border Search Capability and Managerial Digital Concern," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 14(4), pages 4929-4953, December.
    18. Equey, Catherine & Priftis, Athanasios & Trabichet, Jean-Philippe & Hutzli, Vanissla, 2024. "Designing a digital citizen-centered service," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    19. Elias G. Carayannis & David F. J. Campbell & Evangelos Grigoroudis, 2021. "Democracy and the Environment: How Political Freedom Is Linked with Environmental Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-15, May.
    20. Elias G. Carayannis & David F. J. Campbell & Evangelos Grigoroudis, 2022. "Helix Trilogy: the Triple, Quadruple, and Quintuple Innovation Helices from a Theory, Policy, and Practice Set of Perspectives," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 13(3), pages 2272-2301, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jknowl:v:14:y:2023:i:3:d:10.1007_s13132-021-00881-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.