IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jglopt/v82y2022i1d10.1007_s10898-021-01059-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On reduction of exhausters via a support function representation

Author

Listed:
  • Didem Tozkan

    (Eskişehir Technical University)

Abstract

Exhausters are families of compact, convex sets which provide minmax or maxmin representations of positively homogeneous functions and they are efficient tools for the study of nonsmooth functions (Demyanov in Optimization 45:13–29, 1999). Upper and lower exhausters of positively homogeneous functions are employed to describe optimality conditions in geometric terms and also to find directions of steepest descent or ascent. Since an upper/lower exhauster may contain finitely or infinitely many compact convex sets, the problem of minimality and reduction of exhausters naturally arise. There are several approaches to reduce exhausters (Abbasov in J Glob Optim 74(4):737–751, 2019; Grzybowski et al. in J Glob Optim 46(4):589–601, 2010; Küçük et al. in J Optim Theory Appl 165:693–707, 2015; Roshchina in J Optim Theory Appl 136:261–273, 2008; J Convex Anal 15(4):859–868, 2008). In this study, in the sense of inclusion-minimality, some reduction techniques for upper exhausters of positively homogeneous functions defined from $$\mathbb {R}^2$$ R 2 to $$\mathbb {R}$$ R is proposed by means of a representation of support functions. These techniques have concrete geometric meanings and they form a basis for a necessary and sufficient condition for inclusion-minimality of exhausters. Some examples are presented to illustrate each reduction technique.

Suggested Citation

  • Didem Tozkan, 2022. "On reduction of exhausters via a support function representation," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 82(1), pages 105-118, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:jglopt:v:82:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1007_s10898-021-01059-2
    DOI: 10.1007/s10898-021-01059-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10898-021-01059-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10898-021-01059-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. M. Abbasov & V. Demyanov, 2013. "Proper and adjoint exhausters in nonsmooth analysis: optimality conditions," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 56(2), pages 569-585, June.
    2. Majid E. Abbasov, 2017. "Comparison Between Quasidifferentials and Exhausters," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 175(1), pages 59-75, October.
    3. Majid E. Abbasov, 2019. "Geometric conditions of reduction of exhausters," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 74(4), pages 737-751, August.
    4. Majid E. Abbasov, 2020. "Optimality conditions for an exhausterable function on an exhausterable set," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 76(1), pages 57-67, January.
    5. Mahide Küçük & Ryszard Urbański & Jerzy Grzybowski & Yalçın Küçük & İlknur Atasever Güvenç & Didem Tozkan & Mustafa Soyertem, 2015. "Reduction of Weak Exhausters and Optimality Conditions via Reduced Weak Exhausters," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 165(3), pages 693-707, June.
    6. Jerzy Grzybowski & Diethard Pallaschke & Ryszard Urbański, 2010. "Reduction of finite exhausters," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 46(4), pages 589-601, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Majid E. Abbasov, 2019. "Geometric conditions of reduction of exhausters," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 74(4), pages 737-751, August.
    2. Majid E. Abbasov, 2020. "Optimality conditions for an exhausterable function on an exhausterable set," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 76(1), pages 57-67, January.
    3. Tian Sang, 2017. "On the Conjecture by Demyanov–Ryabova in Converting Finite Exhausters," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 174(3), pages 712-727, September.
    4. Valentin V. Gorokhovik & Marina Trafimovich, 2016. "Positively Homogeneous Functions Revisited," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 171(2), pages 481-503, November.
    5. Mahide Küçük & Ryszard Urbański & Jerzy Grzybowski & Yalçın Küçük & İlknur Atasever Güvenç & Didem Tozkan & Mustafa Soyertem, 2015. "Reduction of Weak Exhausters and Optimality Conditions via Reduced Weak Exhausters," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 165(3), pages 693-707, June.
    6. Majid E. Abbasov, 2017. "Comparison Between Quasidifferentials and Exhausters," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 175(1), pages 59-75, October.
    7. Alireza Kabgani, 2021. "Characterization of Nonsmooth Quasiconvex Functions and their Greenberg–Pierskalla’s Subdifferentials Using Semi-Quasidifferentiability notion," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 189(2), pages 666-678, May.
    8. Vivek Laha & Harsh Narayan Singh, 2023. "On quasidifferentiable mathematical programs with equilibrium constraints," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 1-20, December.
    9. M. E. Abbasov, 2016. "Second-Order Minimization Method for Nonsmooth Functions Allowing Convex Quadratic Approximations of the Augment," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 171(2), pages 666-674, November.
    10. Kabgani, Alireza & Soleimani-damaneh, Majid, 2022. "Semi-quasidifferentiability in nonsmooth nonconvex multiobjective optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 299(1), pages 35-45.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jglopt:v:82:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1007_s10898-021-01059-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.