IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jglopt/v61y2015i4p769-788.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Necessary optimality conditions for optimistic bilevel programming problems using set-valued programming

Author

Listed:
  • Stephan Dempe
  • Maria Pilecka

Abstract

In this paper we adapt the main results from Amahroq and Gadhi (J Glob Optim 21:435–443, 2001 ) for a general set-valued optimization problem to an optimistic bilevel programming problem as an optimization problem with implicitly given set-valued constraint. Since this constraint is assumed to be upper but not lower semicontinuous in the sense of Berge, we need to deal with a lower semicontinuous distance function to this mapping. In order to approximate the gradient of the distance function, we introduce a new concept for a directional convexificator. Some calculus rules for this new tool are adapted and several properties are characterized. The main result presents optimality conditions for an optimistic bilevel programming problem using a convexificator constructed with the aid of the directional convexificator. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Suggested Citation

  • Stephan Dempe & Maria Pilecka, 2015. "Necessary optimality conditions for optimistic bilevel programming problems using set-valued programming," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 61(4), pages 769-788, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:jglopt:v:61:y:2015:i:4:p:769-788
    DOI: 10.1007/s10898-014-0200-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s10898-014-0200-4
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10898-014-0200-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. V. Jeyakumar & D.T. LUC, 2008. "Nonsmooth Vector Functions and Continuous Optimization," Springer Optimization and Its Applications, Springer, number 978-0-387-73717-1, June.
    2. Joydeep Dutta & Stephan Dempe, 2006. "Bilevel programming with convex lower level problems," Springer Optimization and Its Applications, in: Stephan Dempe & Vyacheslav Kalashnikov (ed.), Optimization with Multivalued Mappings, pages 51-71, Springer.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Leonardo Lozano & J. Cole Smith, 2017. "A Value-Function-Based Exact Approach for the Bilevel Mixed-Integer Programming Problem," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 65(3), pages 768-786, June.
    2. Maryam Esmaeili & Habibe Sadeghi, 2018. "An Investigation of the Optimistic Solution to the Linear Trilevel Programming Problem," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 6(10), pages 1-11, September.
    3. S. Dempe & S. Franke, 2016. "On the solution of convex bilevel optimization problems," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 63(3), pages 685-703, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Boris S. Mordukhovich & Nguyen Mau Nam & Hung M. Phan, 2012. "Variational Analysis of Marginal Functions with Applications to Bilevel Programming," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 152(3), pages 557-586, March.
    2. Vaithilingam Jeyakumar & Guoyin Li, 2017. "Exact Conic Programming Relaxations for a Class of Convex Polynomial Cone Programs," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 172(1), pages 156-178, January.
    3. Kabgani, Alireza & Soleimani-damaneh, Majid, 2022. "Semi-quasidifferentiability in nonsmooth nonconvex multiobjective optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 299(1), pages 35-45.
    4. N. Dinh & V. Jeyakumar, 2014. "Rejoinder on: Farkas’ lemma: three decades of generalizations for mathematical optimization," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 22(1), pages 41-44, April.
    5. V. Jeyakumar & Guoyin Li, 2011. "Regularized Lagrangian duality for linearly constrained quadratic optimization and trust-region problems," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 49(1), pages 1-14, January.
    6. Szilárd László, 2011. "Some Existence Results of Solutions for General Variational Inequalities," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 150(3), pages 425-443, September.
    7. Stephan Dempe & Alain B. Zemkoho, 2011. "The Generalized Mangasarian-Fromowitz Constraint Qualification and Optimality Conditions for Bilevel Programs," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 148(1), pages 46-68, January.
    8. Tuan, Nguyen Dinh, 2015. "First and second-order optimality conditions for nonsmooth vector optimization using set-valued directional derivatives," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 251(C), pages 300-317.
    9. Qamrul Hasan Ansari & Mahboubeh Rezaei, 2012. "Invariant Pseudolinearity with Applications," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 153(3), pages 587-601, June.
    10. Giuseppe Caristi & Massimiliano Ferrara, 2017. "Necessary conditions for nonsmooth multiobjective semi-infinite problems using Michel–Penot subdifferential," Decisions in Economics and Finance, Springer;Associazione per la Matematica, vol. 40(1), pages 103-113, November.
    11. Guillaume Allaire Pouliot & Zhen Xie, 2022. "Degrees of Freedom and Information Criteria for the Synthetic Control Method," Papers 2207.02943, arXiv.org.
    12. Alireza Kabgani & Majid Soleimani-damaneh & Moslem Zamani, 2017. "Optimality conditions in optimization problems with convex feasible set using convexificators," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 86(1), pages 103-121, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jglopt:v:61:y:2015:i:4:p:769-788. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.