IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jcomop/v34y2017i3d10.1007_s10878-016-0100-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Near optimal algorithms for online weighted bipartite matching in adversary model

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaoming Sun

    (Chinese Academy of Sciences
    University of Chinese Academy of Sciences)

  • Jia Zhang

    (Chinese Academy of Sciences
    University of Chinese Academy of Sciences)

  • Jialin Zhang

    (Chinese Academy of Sciences
    University of Chinese Academy of Sciences)

Abstract

Bipartite matching is an important problem in graph theory. With the prosperity of electronic commerce, such as online auction and AdWords allocation, bipartite matching problem has been extensively studied under online circumstances. In this work, we study the online weighted bipartite matching problem in adversary model, that is, there is a weighted bipartite graph $$G=(L,R,E)$$ G = ( L , R , E ) and the left side L is known as input, while the vertices in R come one by one in an order arranged by the adversary. When each vertex in R comes, its adjacent edges and relative weights are revealed. The algorithm should irreversibly decide whether to match this vertex to an unmatched neighbor in L with the objective to maximize the total weight of the obtained matching. When the weights are unbounded, the best algorithm can only achieve a competitive ratio $$\varTheta \left( \frac{1}{n}\right) $$ Θ 1 n , where n is the number of vertices coming online. Thus, we mainly deal with two variants: the bounded weight problem in which all weights are in the range $$[\alpha , \beta ]$$ [ α , β ] , and the normalized summation problem in which each vertex in one side has the same total weights. We design algorithms for both variants with competitive ratio $$\varTheta \left( \max \left\{ \frac{1}{\log \frac{\beta }{\alpha }},\frac{1}{n}\right\} \right) $$ Θ max 1 log β α , 1 n and $$\varTheta \left( \frac{1}{\log n}\right) $$ Θ 1 log n respectively. Furthermore, we show these two competitive ratios are tight by providing the corresponding hardness results.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaoming Sun & Jia Zhang & Jialin Zhang, 2017. "Near optimal algorithms for online weighted bipartite matching in adversary model," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 34(3), pages 689-705, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:jcomop:v:34:y:2017:i:3:d:10.1007_s10878-016-0100-2
    DOI: 10.1007/s10878-016-0100-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10878-016-0100-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10878-016-0100-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vahideh H. Manshadi & Shayan Oveis Gharan & Amin Saberi, 2012. "Online Stochastic Matching: Online Actions Based on Offline Statistics," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 37(4), pages 559-573, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Huili Zhang & Rui Du & Kelin Luo & Weitian Tong, 2022. "Learn from history for online bipartite matching," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 44(5), pages 3611-3640, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Patrick Jaillet & Xin Lu, 2014. "Online Stochastic Matching: New Algorithms with Better Bounds," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 39(3), pages 624-646, August.
    2. Alberto Vera & Siddhartha Banerjee, 2021. "The Bayesian Prophet: A Low-Regret Framework for Online Decision Making," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(3), pages 1368-1391, March.
    3. Johannes Baumler & Martin Bullinger & Stefan Kober & Donghao Zhu, 2022. "Superiority of Instantaneous Decisions in Thin Dynamic Matching Markets," Papers 2206.10287, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2023.
    4. Clifford Stein & Van-Anh Truong & Xinshang Wang, 2020. "Advance Service Reservations with Heterogeneous Customers," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(7), pages 2929-2950, July.
    5. Ali Hojjat & John Turner & Suleyman Cetintas & Jian Yang, 2017. "A Unified Framework for the Scheduling of Guaranteed Targeted Display Advertising Under Reach and Frequency Requirements," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 65(2), pages 289-313, April.
    6. Ali Aouad & Daniela Saban, 2023. "Online Assortment Optimization for Two-Sided Matching Platforms," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(4), pages 2069-2087, April.
    7. Zhen Xu & Hailun Zhang & Jiheng Zhang & Rachel Q. Zhang, 2020. "Online Demand Fulfillment Under Limited Flexibility," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(10), pages 4667-4685, October.
    8. Hao Wang & Zhenzhen Yan & Xiaohui Bei, 2022. "A nonasymptotic analysis for re‐solving heuristic in online matching," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(8), pages 3096-3124, August.
    9. Huili Zhang & Rui Du & Kelin Luo & Weitian Tong, 2022. "Learn from history for online bipartite matching," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 44(5), pages 3611-3640, December.
    10. Nima Anari & Rad Niazadeh & Amin Saberi & Ali Shameli, 2018. "Linear Programming Based Near-Optimal Pricing for Laminar Bayesian Online Selection," Papers 1807.05477, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2024.
    11. Ross Anderson & Itai Ashlagi & David Gamarnik & Yash Kanoria, 2017. "Efficient Dynamic Barter Exchange," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 65(6), pages 1446-1459, December.
    12. Ge Yu & Sheldon H. Jacobson, 2020. "Primal-dual analysis for online interval scheduling problems," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 77(3), pages 575-602, July.
    13. Santiago R. Balseiro & David B. Brown, 2019. "Approximations to Stochastic Dynamic Programs via Information Relaxation Duality," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 67(2), pages 577-597, March.
    14. Vahideh Manshadi & Scott Rodilitz, 2022. "Online Policies for Efficient Volunteer Crowdsourcing," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(9), pages 6572-6590, September.
    15. Mohammad Akbarpour & Yeganeh Alimohammadi & Shengwu Li & Amin Saberi, 2021. "The Value of Excess Supply in Spatial Matching Markets," Papers 2104.03219, arXiv.org.
    16. Will Ma & David Simchi-Levi, 2020. "Algorithms for Online Matching, Assortment, and Pricing with Tight Weight-Dependent Competitive Ratios," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 68(6), pages 1787-1803, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jcomop:v:34:y:2017:i:3:d:10.1007_s10878-016-0100-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.