IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jcomop/v28y2014i2d10.1007_s10878-012-9558-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mobile facility location: combinatorial filtering via weighted occupancy

Author

Listed:
  • Amitai Armon

    (Tel-Aviv University)

  • Iftah Gamzu

    (Microsoft R&D Center)

  • Danny Segev

    (University of Haifa)

Abstract

An instance of the mobile facility location problem consists of a complete directed graph $$G = (V, E)$$ , in which each arc $$(u, v) \in E$$ is associated with a numerical attribute $$\mathcal M (u,v)$$ , representing the cost of moving any object from $$u$$ to $$v$$ . An additional ingredient of the input is a collection of servers $$S = \{ s_1, \ldots , s_k \}$$ and a set of clients $$C = \{ c_1, \ldots , c_\ell \}$$ , which are located at nodes of the underlying graph. With this setting in mind, a movement scheme is a function $$\psi : S \rightarrow V$$ that relocates each server $$s_i$$ to a new position, $$\psi ( s_i )$$ . We refer to $$\mathcal M ( s_i, \psi ( s_i ) )$$ as the relocation cost of $$s_i$$ , and to $$\min _{i \in [k]} \mathcal M (c_j, \psi ( s_i ) )$$ , the cost of assigning client $$c_j$$ to the nearest final server location, as the service cost of $$c_j$$ . The objective is to compute a movement scheme that minimizes the sum of relocation and service costs. In this paper, we resolve an open question posed by Demaine et al. (SODA ’07) by characterizing the approximability of mobile facility location through LP-based methods. We also develop a more efficient algorithm, which is based on a combinatorial filtering approach. The latter technique is of independent interest, as it may be applicable in other settings as well. In this context, we introduce a weighted version of the occupancy problem, for which we establish interesting tail bounds, not before demonstrating that existing bounds cannot be extended.

Suggested Citation

  • Amitai Armon & Iftah Gamzu & Danny Segev, 2014. "Mobile facility location: combinatorial filtering via weighted occupancy," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 28(2), pages 358-375, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:jcomop:v:28:y:2014:i:2:d:10.1007_s10878-012-9558-8
    DOI: 10.1007/s10878-012-9558-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10878-012-9558-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10878-012-9558-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Serge A. Plotkin & David B. Shmoys & Éva Tardos, 1995. "Fast Approximation Algorithms for Fractional Packing and Covering Problems," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 20(2), pages 257-301, May.
    2. Éva Tardos, 1986. "A Strongly Polynomial Algorithm to Solve Combinatorial Linear Programs," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 34(2), pages 250-256, April.
    3. A.A. Ageev & M.I. Sviridenko, 2004. "Pipage Rounding: A New Method of Constructing Algorithms with Proven Performance Guarantee," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 8(3), pages 307-328, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lisa Fleischer & Michel X. Goemans & Vahab S. Mirrokni & Maxim Sviridenko, 2011. "Tight Approximation Algorithms for Maximum Separable Assignment Problems," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 36(3), pages 416-431, August.
    2. Goldengorin, Boris, 2009. "Maximization of submodular functions: Theory and enumeration algorithms," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 198(1), pages 102-112, October.
    3. Ting Pong & Hao Sun & Ningchuan Wang & Henry Wolkowicz, 2016. "Eigenvalue, quadratic programming, and semidefinite programming relaxations for a cut minimization problem," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 63(2), pages 333-364, March.
    4. Barbara Anthony & Vineet Goyal & Anupam Gupta & Viswanath Nagarajan, 2010. "A Plant Location Guide for the Unsure: Approximation Algorithms for Min-Max Location Problems," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 35(1), pages 79-101, February.
    5. R. B. Bapat & S. K. Neogy, 2016. "On a quadratic programming problem involving distances in trees," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 243(1), pages 365-373, August.
    6. Balaji Gopalakrishnan & Seunghyun Kong & Earl Barnes & Ellis Johnson & Joel Sokol, 2011. "A least-squares minimum-cost network flow algorithm," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 186(1), pages 119-140, June.
    7. Evgeny Shchepin & Nodari Vakhania, 2006. "An absolute approximation algorithm for scheduling unrelated machines," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 53(6), pages 502-507, September.
    8. Suning Gong & Qingqin Nong & Shuyu Bao & Qizhi Fang & Ding-Zhu Du, 2023. "A fast and deterministic algorithm for Knapsack-constrained monotone DR-submodular maximization over an integer lattice," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 85(1), pages 15-38, January.
    9. Clemens Heuberger, 2004. "Inverse Combinatorial Optimization: A Survey on Problems, Methods, and Results," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 8(3), pages 329-361, September.
    10. Jiaju Miao & Pawel Polak, 2023. "Online Ensemble of Models for Optimal Predictive Performance with Applications to Sector Rotation Strategy," Papers 2304.09947, arXiv.org.
    11. Amitabh Basu & Jesús A. De Loera & Mark Junod, 2014. "On Chubanov's Method for Linear Programming," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 26(2), pages 336-350, May.
    12. László A. Végh, 2017. "A Strongly Polynomial Algorithm for Generalized Flow Maximization," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 42(1), pages 179-211, January.
    13. Mao-Cheng Cai & Xiaoguang Yang & Yanjun Li, 1999. "Inverse Polymatroidal Flow Problem," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 115-126, July.
    14. Bin Liu & Miaomiao Hu, 2022. "Fast algorithms for maximizing monotone nonsubmodular functions," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 43(5), pages 1655-1670, July.
    15. Alberto Caprara & Andrea Lodi & Michele Monaci, 2005. "Fast Approximation Schemes for Two-Stage, Two-Dimensional Bin Packing," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 30(1), pages 150-172, February.
    16. D. V. Gribanov & D. S. Malyshev & P. M. Pardalos & S. I. Veselov, 2018. "FPT-algorithms for some problems related to integer programming," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 35(4), pages 1128-1146, May.
    17. M. Cai & X. Yang & Y. Li, 2000. "Inverse Problems of Submodular Functions on Digraphs," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 104(3), pages 559-575, March.
    18. Prabhjot Kaur & Anuj Sharma & Vanita Verma & Kalpana Dahiya, 2022. "An alternate approach to solve two-level hierarchical time minimization transportation problem," 4OR, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 23-61, March.
    19. Paulo Oliveira, 2014. "A strongly polynomial-time algorithm for the strict homogeneous linear-inequality feasibility problem," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 80(3), pages 267-284, December.
    20. Steffen Borgwardt & Stephan Patterson, 2021. "On the computational complexity of finding a sparse Wasserstein barycenter," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 41(3), pages 736-761, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jcomop:v:28:y:2014:i:2:d:10.1007_s10878-012-9558-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.