IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/ijsaem/v10y2019i4d10.1007_s13198-019-00817-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Benchmarking framework for class imbalance problem using novel sampling approach for big data

Author

Listed:
  • Khyati Ahlawat

    (Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University)

  • Anuradha Chug

    (Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University)

  • Amit Prakash Singh

    (Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University)

Abstract

The traditional techniques of machine learning always need to be strengthened for dealing with cosmic nature of big data for systematic and methodical learning. The unbalanced distribution of classes in big data, popularly known as imbalanced big data chases the problem of learning to a much higher level. The conventional methods are being progressively modified to handle and curtail the problem of learning from imbalanced datasets in the context of big data at the data level and algorithmic level. In the current study, a cluster heads based data level sampling solution which inherits edge of K-Means and Fuzzy C-Means clustering approaches is applied. The proposed approach is evaluated with three different classifiers namely Support Vector Machines, Decision Tree and k-Nearest Neighbor and compared with conventional SMOTE algorithm. The experiment has shown promising results with an increment of 8.09% and 35.71% in terms of accuracy and AUC respectively, for all imbalanced datasets. This work imparts a baseline comparison of solutions for imbalanced classification at data level in big data scenario and proposes an efficient clustering-based solution for same.

Suggested Citation

  • Khyati Ahlawat & Anuradha Chug & Amit Prakash Singh, 2019. "Benchmarking framework for class imbalance problem using novel sampling approach for big data," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 10(4), pages 824-835, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:ijsaem:v:10:y:2019:i:4:d:10.1007_s13198-019-00817-6
    DOI: 10.1007/s13198-019-00817-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13198-019-00817-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s13198-019-00817-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gong, Joonho & Kim, Hyunjoong, 2017. "RHSBoost: Improving classification performance in imbalance data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 1-13.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Daniele Cuntrera & Vincenzo Falco & Ornella Giambalvo, 2022. "On the Sampling Size for Inverse Sampling," Stats, MDPI, vol. 5(4), pages 1-15, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lisa Crosato & Caterina Liberati & Marco Repetto, 2021. "Look Who's Talking: Interpretable Machine Learning for Assessing Italian SMEs Credit Default," Papers 2108.13914, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2021.
    2. Florian Dumpert & Martin Beck, 2017. "Einsatz von Machine-Learning-Verfahren in amtlichen Unternehmensstatistiken [Use of machine learning in official business statistics]," AStA Wirtschafts- und Sozialstatistisches Archiv, Springer;Deutsche Statistische Gesellschaft - German Statistical Society, vol. 11(2), pages 83-106, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:ijsaem:v:10:y:2019:i:4:d:10.1007_s13198-019-00817-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.