IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/ijlaec/v68y2025i3d10.1007_s41027-025-00582-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does Industrial Robotics Impact Employment in Indian Manufacturing: Examining Labour Market Outcomes

Author

Listed:
  • Bino Paul

    (Tata Institute of Social Sciences)

  • Unmesh Patnaik

    (Tata Institute of Social Sciences)

  • Ramesh C. Datta

    (Tata Institute of Social Sciences)

  • C. T. Saritha

    (Tata Institute of Social Sciences)

  • Sumesh P. Soman

    (Indian Institute of Management)

Abstract

India currently reports one of the lowest robot densities worldwide. Nevertheless, the country’s industrial robot stock is consistently increasing, although adoption rates vary across different industries. We analyse the impact of industrial robots on wage employment in manufacturing in India from 2017 to 2022, particularly focusing on the plant and machinery labour force. Our study utilises data from the International Federation of Robotics (IFR)and various Periodic Labour Force Survey (PLFS) rounds to investigate employment dynamics based on application types, industries, and occupations. Among the occupational streams, robots directly impact plant and machine operators, especially in the automotive industry. The recent arc elasticity of employment to robots is negative for this occupational segment, implying that robots substitute specific segments of industrial labour. We examine two labour market outcomes: wage levels and formal employment. Using classification trees, we assess the influence of human capital and experience on wages and the implications for the substitution and complementarity of labour factors. Our findings reveal that the growth of industrial robots coexists with a stagnant low-skilled labour force while high-skilled labour expands, especially in larger firms. The development of the high human capital segment coexists with a visible drop in nominal and real wages and required experience. It indicates that in India, industrial robots tend to substitute routine labour, such as in material handling operations. However, further disruptions may affect the skilled workforce if the focus of robot manufacturing shifts from mechatronics to artificial intelligence-based technologies.

Suggested Citation

  • Bino Paul & Unmesh Patnaik & Ramesh C. Datta & C. T. Saritha & Sumesh P. Soman, 2025. "Does Industrial Robotics Impact Employment in Indian Manufacturing: Examining Labour Market Outcomes," The Indian Journal of Labour Economics, Springer;The Indian Society of Labour Economics (ISLE), vol. 68(3), pages 749-790, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:ijlaec:v:68:y:2025:i:3:d:10.1007_s41027-025-00582-0
    DOI: 10.1007/s41027-025-00582-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s41027-025-00582-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s41027-025-00582-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • O14 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Industrialization; Manufacturing and Service Industries; Choice of Technology
    • E24 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Consumption, Saving, Production, Employment, and Investment - - - Employment; Unemployment; Wages; Intergenerational Income Distribution; Aggregate Human Capital; Aggregate Labor Productivity
    • J01 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - General - - - Labor Economics: General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:ijlaec:v:68:y:2025:i:3:d:10.1007_s41027-025-00582-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.