IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/grdene/v32y2023i1d10.1007_s10726-022-09803-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Applying the AHP to Conflict Resolution: A Russia—NATO Case Study

Author

Listed:
  • Marcel C. Minutolo

    (Robert Morris University)

  • Luis G. Vargas

    (University of Pittsburgh)

  • Amos N. Guiora

    (University of Utah)

  • Madhury Ray

    (International Center for Conflict Resolution)

Abstract

In this paper, we apply the Analytic Hierarchy Process approach to conflict resolution in the context of the Russia–Ukraine conflict. We build models that illustrate the evaluation criteria, strategic and sub-criteria, and concessions for each party in this negotiation. Ratings are used to evaluate the degree to which concessions contribute or take away from successful resolution of the conflict. Afterwards, gain ratios are built to determine the benefit-cost scores so that concessions may be traded that result in equitable solutions. The approach presented here demonstrates for the first time why all concessions that parties to a conflict may offer might not trade all at once. A Max–Min optimization approach is used to maximize the gain to both parties of the conflict while minimizing the disparity in gain between the two.

Suggested Citation

  • Marcel C. Minutolo & Luis G. Vargas & Amos N. Guiora & Madhury Ray, 2023. "Applying the AHP to Conflict Resolution: A Russia—NATO Case Study," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 32(1), pages 147-176, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:grdene:v:32:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1007_s10726-022-09803-z
    DOI: 10.1007/s10726-022-09803-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10726-022-09803-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10726-022-09803-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Thomas L. Saaty & Luis G. Vargas, 2012. "A New Approach to the Middle East Conflict: The Analytic Hierarchy Process," International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, in: Models, Methods, Concepts & Applications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, edition 2, chapter 0, pages 203-247, Springer.
    2. Vlad Mykhnenko, 2020. "Causes and Consequences of the War in Eastern Ukraine: An Economic Geography Perspective," Europe-Asia Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 72(3), pages 528-560, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marcin Wójcik & Pamela Jeziorska-Biel, 2023. "Geographies of Energy: Key Issues and Challenges towards Spatial Justice Concepts," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-9, January.
    2. Cătălin Peptan & Alina Georgiana Holt & Flavius Cristian Mărcău, 2023. "Influences of Recent Crises in the European Space on the Exercise of Certain Rights and Citizen Duties in Romania: A Sustainable Perspective Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-17, July.
    3. Borys Kormych & Tetyana Malyarenko & Cindy Wittke, 2023. "Rescaling the legal dimensions of grey zones: Evidence from Ukraine," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 14(3), pages 516-530, June.
    4. Oana Panazan & Catalin Gheorghe, 2024. "Impact of Geopolitical Risk on G7 Financial Markets: A Comparative Wavelet Analysis between 2014 and 2022," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-22, January.
    5. Maria Nijnik & Tatiana Kluvánková & Mariana Melnykovych & Albert Nijnik & Serhiy Kopiy & Stanislava Brnkaľáková & Simo Sarkki & Leonid Kopiy & Igor Fizyk & Carla Barlagne & David Miller, 2021. "An Institutional Analysis and Reconfiguration Framework for Sustainability Research on Post-Transition Forestry—A Focus on Ukraine," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-21, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:grdene:v:32:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1007_s10726-022-09803-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.