IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/eujoag/v22y2025i1d10.1007_s10433-025-00841-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Distance from home and working memory: daily associations varying by neighborhood environments in community-dwelling older adults

Author

Listed:
  • Minxia Luo

    (University Research Priority Program (URPP) Dynamics of Healthy Aging, University of Zurich
    University of Zurich
    University of Zurich)

  • Eun-Kyeong Kim

    (Urban Development and Mobility (UDM), Luxembourg Institute of Socio-Economic Research (LISER)
    University of Zurich)

  • Robert Weibel

    (University Research Priority Program (URPP) Dynamics of Healthy Aging, University of Zurich
    University of Zurich
    University of Zurich)

  • Mike Martin

    (University Research Priority Program (URPP) Dynamics of Healthy Aging, University of Zurich
    University of Zurich
    University of Zurich)

  • Christina Röcke

    (University Research Priority Program (URPP) Dynamics of Healthy Aging, University of Zurich
    University of Zurich)

Abstract

Out-of-home mobility and neighborhood environment have been, respectively, shown to be associated with older adults’ cognitive abilities and they may have combined effects. Adopting an ecological perspective to mobility–cognition associations, this study examined daily maximum distance from home in relation to daily working memory performance in community-dwelling older adults and the moderation effect of neighborhood environments. Analyses included data over 947 days from 109 Swiss older adults aged 65 to 89 years. Over two weeks, participants wore a custom-built mobile GPS tracker and completed a smartphone-based numerical memory updating task seven times per day. Daily maximum distance from home was extracted from the GPS data. Neighborhood environments were assessed with the Neighborhood Environment Walkability Scale at baseline. Multilevel models showed that maximum distance from home was not associated with working memory performance, but there were cross-level moderation effects of neighborhood environments. Daily maximum distance from home was positively (vs. negatively) associated with daily working memory performance in participants who lived in neighborhoods with more (vs. fewer) places for walking and cycling and higher (vs. lower) land use mix-diversity. Out-of-home mobility and neighborhood environment could have combined effects on older adults’ cognitive abilities. Neighborhoods with more places for walking and biking or having a higher mixture of land use could enhance a positive association between traveling a far distance from home and working memory performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Minxia Luo & Eun-Kyeong Kim & Robert Weibel & Mike Martin & Christina Röcke, 2025. "Distance from home and working memory: daily associations varying by neighborhood environments in community-dwelling older adults," European Journal of Ageing, Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 1-14, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:eujoag:v:22:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s10433-025-00841-5
    DOI: 10.1007/s10433-025-00841-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10433-025-00841-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10433-025-00841-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nicolo P Pinchak & Christopher R Browning & Catherine A Calder & Bethany Boettner, 2021. "Activity locations, residential segregation and the significance of residential neighbourhood boundary perceptions," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(13), pages 2758-2781, October.
    2. Winters, Meghan & Voss, Christine & Ashe, Maureen C. & Gutteridge, Kaitlyn & McKay, Heather & Sims-Gould, Joanie, 2015. "Where do they go and how do they get there? Older adults' travel behaviour in a highly walkable environment," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 304-312.
    3. Eleftheria Giannouli & Otmar Bock & Wiebren Zijlstra, 2018. "Cognitive functioning is more closely related to real-life mobility than to laboratory-based mobility parameters," European Journal of Ageing, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 57-65, March.
    4. Erin York Cornwell & Kathleen A Cagney, 2017. "Aging in Activity Space: Results From Smartphone-Based GPS-Tracking of Urban Seniors," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 72(5), pages 864-875.
    5. Wörn, Jonathan & Ellwardt, Lea & Aartsen, Marja & Huisman, Martijn, 2017. "Cognitive functioning among Dutch older adults: Do neighborhood socioeconomic status and urbanity matter?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 187(C), pages 29-38.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mark P.C. Cherrie & Niamh K. Shortt & Catharine Ward Thompson & Ian J. Deary & Jamie R. Pearce, 2019. "Association Between the Activity Space Exposure to Parks in Childhood and Adolescence and Cognitive Aging in Later Life," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-13, February.
    2. Zhang, Yongsheng & Yao, Enjian & Zhang, Rui & Xu, Hao, 2019. "Analysis of elderly people's travel behaviours during the morning peak hours in the context of the free bus programme in Beijing, China," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 191-199.
    3. Fillekes, Michelle Pasquale & Röcke, Christina & Katana, Marko & Weibel, Robert, 2019. "Self-reported versus GPS-derived indicators of daily mobility in a sample of healthy older adults," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 220(C), pages 193-202.
    4. Mifsud, Deborah & Attard, Maria & Ison, Stephen, 2017. "To drive or to use the bus? An exploratory study of older people in Malta," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 23-32.
    5. Chen, Xi & Lee, Chanam & Huang, Hao, 2022. "Neighborhood built environment associated with cognition and dementia risk among older adults: A systematic literature review," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 292(C).
    6. Engel, L. & Chudyk, A.M. & Ashe, M.C. & McKay, H.A. & Whitehurst, D.G.T. & Bryan, S., 2016. "Older adults' quality of life – Exploring the role of the built environment and social cohesion in community-dwelling seniors on low income," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 1-11.
    7. Meijering, Louise & Weitkamp, Gerd, 2024. "‘I choose the quiet roads’: Everyday mobility in later life on the urban–rural continuum of the Northern Netherlands," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    8. Ottoni, Callista A. & Sims-Gould, Joanie & Winters, Meghan & Heijnen, Myrthe & McKay, Heather A., 2016. "“Benches become like porches”: Built and social environment influences on older adults’ experiences of mobility and well-being," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 33-41.
    9. Kim, Hongjik & Usui, Hiroyuki & Asami, Yasushi & Hino, Kimihiro, 2022. "A simulation of allocation of participants engaging in group activities at community salons: Accessibility and self-stigma," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 292(C).
    10. Cláudia Jardim Santos & Inês Paciência & Ana Isabel Ribeiro, 2022. "Neighbourhood Socioeconomic Processes and Dynamics and Healthy Ageing: A Scoping Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-26, May.
    11. Julia Seinsche & Wiebren Zijlstra & Eleftheria Giannouli, 2020. "Motility in Frail Older Adults: Operationalization of a New Framework and First Insights into Its Relationship with Physical Activity and Life-Space Mobility: An Exploratory Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(23), pages 1-20, November.
    12. Cintya Lanchimba & Joselyn Quisnancela & Yasmín Salazar Méndez, 2020. "The choice of elderly labor: Evidence from Ecuador," Revista de Analisis Economico – Economic Analysis Review, Universidad Alberto Hurtado/School of Economics and Business, vol. 35(1), pages 75-97, April.
    13. Marica Cassarino & Eleanor Bantry-White & Annalisa Setti, 2020. "Neighbourhood Environment and Cognitive Vulnerability—A Survey Investigation of Variations Across the Lifespan and Urbanity Levels," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-15, September.
    14. Pantelaki, Evangelia & Maggi, Elena & Crotti, Daniele, 2021. "Mobility impact and well-being in later life: A multidisciplinary systematic review," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    15. Becky P. Y. Loo & Zhuangyuan Fan & Esteban Moro, 2024. "Residential and experienced social segregation: the roles of different transport modes, metro extensions, and longitudinal changes in Hong Kong," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-13, December.
    16. Su, Rongxiang & Xiao, Jingyi & McBride, Elizabeth C. & Goulias, Konstadinos G., 2021. "Understanding senior's daily mobility patterns in California using human mobility motifs," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    17. Ben Senkler & Julius Freymueller & Susanne Lopez Lumbi & Claudia Hornberg & Hannah-Lea Schmid & Kristina Hennig-Fast & Gernot Horstmann & Timothy Mc Call, 2022. "Urbanicity—Perspectives from Neuroscience and Public Health: A Scoping Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-16, December.
    18. Fan Yang & Linxi Xu & Jiayin Wang, 2025. "Spatial Morphology of Urban Residential Space: A Complex Network Analysis Integrating Social and Physical Space," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-21, March.
    19. Jian Feng & Huali Hou, 2023. "Review of Research on Urban Social Space and Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-26, November.
    20. Tzuyuan Stessa Chao & Xiaoqin Jiang & Yi Sun & Jheng-Ze Yu, 2021. "A Space-Time Analysis of Rural Older People’s Outdoor Mobility and Its Impact on Self-Rated Health: Evidence from a Taiwanese Rural Village," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-18, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:eujoag:v:22:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s10433-025-00841-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.