IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/eujhec/v26y2025i9d10.1007_s10198-025-01785-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How perceptions of bone marrow donation costs affect donation behavior: survey evidence from a large donor registry

Author

Listed:
  • Michael Haylock

    (CINCH Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen)

  • Patrick Kampkötter

    (Eberhard Karls University Tübingen)

  • Mario Macis

    (Johns Hopkins University, Carey Business School, IZA, and NBER)

  • Susanne Seitz

    (DKMS Group gGmbH Tübingen)

  • Robert Slonim

    (University of Technology Sydney and IZA)

  • Edith Wienand

    (DKMS Group gGmbH Tübingen)

  • Daniel Wiesen

    (University of Cologne, Department of Health Care Management and Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management)

  • Alexander H. Schmidt

    (DKMS Group gGmbH Tübingen)

Abstract

Over the past three decades, advancements in collection methods for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation substantially reduced invasiveness and safety concerns. To what extent, however, registered donors are informed about extraction methods and how their beliefs drive their willingness to follow through with a donation is not well understood. Inaccurate beliefs about extraction methods may cause donors to overestimate their perceived cost, potentially reducing donations. In a survey with about 24,000 potential donors in Germany’s largest stem-cell registry, we investigate how beliefs about extraction methods affect potential donors’ willingness to follow through with a stem cell donation. We find widespread misconceptions about extraction methods, with many donors attributing a significant fraction of stem cell extractions to be coming from never-used methods. Importantly, a lack of knowledge and misconceptions about extraction methods persist among registered donors, often anchored to methods that prevailed at the time of registration. Exploring the link between donors’ beliefs and their (stated) willingness to donate, we find that accurate beliefs about lower extraction costs correlate with a 2.2–2.9 percentage points higher willingness to donate, representing a 40% reduction in donor unavailability. Our results highlight the need for informational campaigns to correct donors’ misconceptions and potentially save more lives among blood cancer patients.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael Haylock & Patrick Kampkötter & Mario Macis & Susanne Seitz & Robert Slonim & Edith Wienand & Daniel Wiesen & Alexander H. Schmidt, 2025. "How perceptions of bone marrow donation costs affect donation behavior: survey evidence from a large donor registry," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 26(9), pages 1613-1631, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:eujhec:v:26:y:2025:i:9:d:10.1007_s10198-025-01785-4
    DOI: 10.1007/s10198-025-01785-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10198-025-01785-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10198-025-01785-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • I12 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Health Behavior
    • I18 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Government Policy; Regulation; Public Health

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:eujhec:v:26:y:2025:i:9:d:10.1007_s10198-025-01785-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.