IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/eujhec/v17y2016i4d10.1007_s10198-016-0768-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Prioritizing health services research: an economic perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Afschin Gandjour

    () (Frankfurt School of Finance and Management)

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Given limited resources policymakers need to decide about how much and in what areas of health services research (HSR) to invest. The purpose of this study is to provide guidance for priority setting of HSR projects based on economic theory. Methods The conceptual analysis starts from the premise that competition in health care is valuable—a position that seems to predominate among Western policymakers. The principle of competition rests on economic theory and, in particular, its branch of welfare economics. Results Based on economic theory, the role of HSR is to detect and alleviate information asymmetry, negative externalities, and harm caused by competition and inappropriate incentives for competition. A hierarchy of HSR projects is provided; following the ethical principle of harm (‘do not harm’), the detection and prevention of harm would receive highest priority among HSR projects. Conclusions Agreeing that competition is valuable in achieving efficiency and quality of care (and therefore agreeing to the assumptions of economic theory) implies accepting the role of HSR in detecting market failure and the HSR hierarchy as suggested. Disagreement would require an alternative coherent concept of improving efficiency and quality of care.

Suggested Citation

  • Afschin Gandjour, 2016. "Prioritizing health services research: an economic perspective," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 17(4), pages 375-377, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:eujhec:v:17:y:2016:i:4:d:10.1007_s10198-016-0768-3
    DOI: 10.1007/s10198-016-0768-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10198-016-0768-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Afschin Gandjour, 2010. "A model to predict the cost-effectiveness of disease management programs," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 19(6), pages 697-715.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:eujhec:v:17:y:2016:i:4:d:10.1007_s10198-016-0768-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Sonal Shukla) or (Rebekah McClure). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.