IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/eujhec/v15y2014i1d10.1007_s10198-013-0458-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Changes in the remuneration system for general practitioners: effects on contact type and consultation length

Author

Listed:
  • Christel E. van Dijk

    (NIVEL, Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research)

  • Robert A. Verheij

    (NIVEL, Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research)

  • Hans te Brake

    (IMPACT, Dutch Knowledge and Advice Center for Post-disaster Psychosocial Care)

  • Peter Spreeuwenberg

    (NIVEL, Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research)

  • Peter P. Groenewegen

    (NIVEL, Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research
    Utrecht University
    Utrecht University)

  • Dinny H. de Bakker

    (NIVEL, Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research
    Tilburg University)

Abstract

In The Netherlands, the remuneration system for GPs changed in 2006. Before the change, GPs received a capitation fee for publicly insured patients and fee for service (FFS) for privately insured patients. In 2006, a combined system was introduced for all patients, with elements of capitation as well as FFS. This created a unique opportunity to investigate the effects of the change in the remuneration system on contact type and consultation length. Our hypothesis was that for former publicly insured patients the change would lead to an increase in the proportion of home visits, a decrease in the proportion of telephone consultations and an increase in consultation length relative to formerly privately insured patients. Data were used from electronic medical records from 36 to 58 Dutch GP practices and from 532,800 to 743,961 patient contacts between 2002 and 2008 for contact type data. For consultation length, 1,994 videotaped consultations were used from 85 GP practices in 2002 and 499 consultations from 16 GP practices in 2008. Multilevel multinomial regression analysis was used to analyse consultation type. Multilevel logistic and linear regression analyses were used to examine consultation length. Our study shows that contact type and consultation length were hardly affected by the change in remuneration system, though the proportion of home visits slightly decreased for privately insured patients compared with publicly insured patients. Declaration behaviour regarding telephone consultations did change; GP practices more consistently declared telephone consultations after 2006.

Suggested Citation

  • Christel E. van Dijk & Robert A. Verheij & Hans te Brake & Peter Spreeuwenberg & Peter P. Groenewegen & Dinny H. de Bakker, 2014. "Changes in the remuneration system for general practitioners: effects on contact type and consultation length," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 15(1), pages 83-91, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:eujhec:v:15:y:2014:i:1:d:10.1007_s10198-013-0458-3
    DOI: 10.1007/s10198-013-0458-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10198-013-0458-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10198-013-0458-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • I18 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Government Policy; Regulation; Public Health
    • I19 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Other

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:eujhec:v:15:y:2014:i:1:d:10.1007_s10198-013-0458-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.