IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/endesu/v23y2021i3d10.1007_s10668-020-00751-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Understanding community perceptions of an urban stream before and after a discussion of revitalization possibilities using photo-elicitation

Author

Listed:
  • Simone Preuss

    (Federal University of Ceara
    Federal University of Pernambuco
    Edith Cowan University - Joondalup
    Murdoch University)

  • Jaime Cabral

    (Federal University of Pernambuco
    University of Pernambuco)

  • Angus Morrison-Saunders

    (Edith Cowan University - Joondalup
    Murdoch University
    North West University)

  • Mike Hughes

    (Edith Cowan University - Joondalup)

  • Ana Bárbara Nunes

    (Federal University of Ceara)

Abstract

Understanding local community perceptions is an important first step in seeking ways to revitalize degraded urban streams. This research sought to understand community perceptions of the highly modified Parnamirim stream in the city of Recife, Brazil and to solicit perspectives on potential for revitalization of the stream before and after discussion of such possibilities using a photo-elicitation-based approach. Structured interviews were conducted with 167 residents situated close to the stream using three photographs of urban streams in various stages of modification and revitalization to prompt responses regarding preferences and opportunities for stream revitalization. While a majority of respondents overall indicated that the Parnamirim stream currently looks like a degraded stream (as depicted in one photograph), these perceptions generally matched the characteristics of the stream in their particular area of residence, indicating that people’s perceptions are influenced by the quality of their immediate environment. However, after the brief discussion of urban stream revitalization practices, there was overall positive response for Parnamirim stream to become like the photograph of the revitalized stream shown to participants. Our findings point to the power and utility of the photo-elicitation method in terms of provoking emotional and cognitive responses to local environmental conditions and in promoting changed community perceptions of possible Parnamirim stream revitalization and its future potential. The potential for social desirability bias to influence community perceptions is acknowledged regarding the post-discussion preferences and comments regarding the potential for revitalization of Parnamirim stream. Nevertheless, the research demonstrates the value of engagement in discussion and ideas sharing with community members through the use of photo-elicitation and such approaches may represent an important first step in realizing urban stream revitalization.

Suggested Citation

  • Simone Preuss & Jaime Cabral & Angus Morrison-Saunders & Mike Hughes & Ana Bárbara Nunes, 2021. "Understanding community perceptions of an urban stream before and after a discussion of revitalization possibilities using photo-elicitation," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 3946-3965, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:23:y:2021:i:3:d:10.1007_s10668-020-00751-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s10668-020-00751-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10668-020-00751-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10668-020-00751-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ken Yocom, 2014. "Building Watershed Narratives: An Approach for Broadening the Scope of Success in Urban Stream Restoration," Landscape Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(6), pages 698-714, December.
    2. Annicka Cettner & Kristina Söderholm & Maria Viklander, 2012. "An Adaptive Stormwater Culture? Historical Perspectives on the Status of Stormwater within the Swedish Urban Water System," Journal of Urban Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(3), pages 25-40.
    3. May, Rachel, 2006. "“Connectivity” in urban rivers: Conflict and convergence between ecology and design," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 28(4), pages 477-488.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Spicer, E. Anne & Swaffield, Simon & Moore, Kevin, 2021. "Agricultural land use management responses to a cap and trade regime for water quality in Lake Taupo catchment, New Zealand," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    2. Suleiman, Lina, 2021. "Blue green infrastructure, from niche to mainstream: Challenges and opportunities for planning in Stockholm," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    3. Frodeman, Robert & Klein, Julie Thompson & Mitcham, Carl & Tuana, Nancy, 2007. "Interdisciplinary studies in science, technology, and society: “New Directions: Science, Humanities, Policy”," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 145-152.
    4. Blal Adem Esmail & Lina Suleiman, 2020. "Analyzing Evidence of Sustainable Urban Water Management Systems: A Review through the Lenses of Sociotechnical Transitions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-45, June.
    5. Lucie Havránková & Přemysl Štych & Pavel Ondr & Jana Moravcová & Jiří Sláma, 2023. "Assessment of the Connectivity and Comfort of Urban Rivers, a Case Study of the Czech Republic," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-20, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:23:y:2021:i:3:d:10.1007_s10668-020-00751-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.