IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/endesu/v21y2019i1d10.1007_s10668-017-0026-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Implementing ecological networks through the Red for Green approach in a densely populated country: Does it work?

Author

Listed:
  • V. Simeonova

    (Wageningen University
    Wageningen Environmental Research)

  • E. Achterberg

    (Wageningen University)

  • E. A. Grift

    (Wageningen Environmental Research)

Abstract

Regional and local governments in Europe are often challenged with establishing suitable institutional practices to meet ecological targets within urban spatial development plans and address the ultimate goal of the Environmental Policy Integration (EPI). EPI has been proliferated by the European policy as the operational principle to sustainable development. Yet it is necessary to develop and apply suitable approaches that allow achieving EPI within the policy implementation practices of the local and regional authorities. Particularly in the field of urban planning, such EPI approaches are needed to more firmly integrate ecological considerations in the land-use planning process and safeguard the sustainability of urban developments. This is the case when implementing key nature policy objectives such as the development of national ecological networks (NEN) aimed at protecting biodiversity, and in which multiple actors and sectorial interests are involved. Among European countries, the Netherlands has been a forerunner in NEN development and has applied innovative approaches such as the Red for Green approach (RGA). The RGA aims to integrate ecological issues (green) in urban developments (red) and establishes a communicative platform for the actors involved in the urban developments. This study assesses the unique experiences with the RGA in seven regional case studies, identifies its key success factors and reflects on its role as a communicative practice towards EPI. The study concludes that the RGA can be a suitable approach to integrating ecological network objectives in urban developments. However, RGA’s success depends on five factors, among which the two most important are the actors’ communication and development of a shared strategic vision on developments.

Suggested Citation

  • V. Simeonova & E. Achterberg & E. A. Grift, 2019. "Implementing ecological networks through the Red for Green approach in a densely populated country: Does it work?," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 115-143, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:21:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1007_s10668-017-0026-6
    DOI: 10.1007/s10668-017-0026-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10668-017-0026-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10668-017-0026-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Miklas Scholz & Åsa Hedmark & William Hartley, 2012. "Recent advances in sustainable multifunctional land and urban management in Europe: a review," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(7), pages 833-854, September.
    2. Vivek Shandas & Jessica Graybill & Clare Ryan, 2008. "Incorporating ecosystem-based management into urban environmental policy: a case study from western Washington," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 51(5), pages 647-662.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wei Wang & Ziyuan Sun & Weixing Zhu & Lin Ma & Yuting Dong & Xiao Sun & Fengzhi Wu, 2023. "How does multi‐agent govern corporate greenwashing? A stakeholder engagement perspective from “common” to “collaborative” governance," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(1), pages 291-307, January.
    2. Carter, Virginia & Derudder, Ben & Henríquez, Cristián, 2021. "Assessing local governments’ perception of the potential implementation of biophilic urbanism in Chile: A latent class approach," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    3. Koreman, Maarten Cornelis Johannes & Korthals Altes, Willem Kornelis, 2023. "Re-using vacant farm buildings for commercial purposes: Two cases from the Netherlands," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shuangqing Sheng & Wei Song & Hua Lian & Lei Ning, 2022. "Review of Urban Land Management Based on Bibliometrics," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-25, November.
    2. Qiuyan Liu & Mingwu Wang & Xiao Wang & Fengqiang Shen & Juliang Jin, 2018. "Land Eco-Security Assessment Based on the Multi-Dimensional Connection Cloud Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-13, June.
    3. Dongli Chen & Degang Yang & Xinhuan Zhang & Yannan Zhao & Yufang Zhang, 2018. "Spatial Suitability Evaluation of an Arid City Based on the Perspective of Major Function Oriented Zoning: A Case Study of Urumqi City in Xinjiang, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-18, August.
    4. Marco Criado & Antonio Martínez-Graña & Fernando Santos-Francés & Sergio Veleda & Caridad Zazo, 2017. "Multi-Criteria Analyses of Urban Planning for City Expansion: A Case Study of Zamora, Spain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-18, October.
    5. Hualin Xie & Zhifei Liu & Peng Wang & Guiying Liu & Fucai Lu, 2013. "Exploring the Mechanisms of Ecological Land Change Based on the Spatial Autoregressive Model: A Case Study of the Poyang Lake Eco-Economic Zone, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-17, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:21:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1007_s10668-017-0026-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.