IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/elmark/v35y2025i1d10.1007_s12525-025-00801-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Augmenting the reality of decision-making: Comparing and combining product experiences’ influence on choice difficulty and mental imagery

Author

Listed:
  • Maaike Ven

    (UHasselt – Hasselt University, Faculty of Business Economics – Department of Marketing & Strategy
    Vrije Universiteit Brussel, imec-SMIT)

  • Lieve Doucé

    (UHasselt – Hasselt University, Faculty of Business Economics – Department of Marketing & Strategy)

  • Kim Willems

    (UHasselt – Hasselt University, Faculty of Business Economics – Department of Marketing & Strategy
    Vrije Universiteit Brussel, imec-SMIT)

  • Felitsa Rademakers

    (UHasselt – Hasselt University, Faculty of Business Economics – Department of Marketing & Strategy
    Vrije Universiteit Brussel, imec-SMIT)

  • Malaika Brengman

    (Vrije Universiteit Brussel, imec-SMIT)

  • Philippine Loupiac

    (TBS Business School - Social & Innovation Marketing Lab)

Abstract

Companies are increasingly adopting augmented reality (AR) to provide new virtual product experiences for consumers. Despite practical and academic interest, AR’s potential to reduce the negative effects of choice overload remains largely unexplored. Drawing on cognitive load theory, this article compares and combines AR with a more indirect product experience (i.e., physical product swatches) to examine the relationships between mental imagery, choice difficulty, choice confidence, and purchase intention while considering decision-making style as a moderator. The results show that AR, especially static AR, enhances mental imagery and that this imagery is key in influencing choice difficulty and confidence. However, difficulty can also be reduced by combining AR with a more traditional indirect product experience. Furthermore, mental imagery and choice difficulty influence choice confidence, subsequently affecting purchase intentions. Only for people with a maximizing decision-making style was a direct effect of choice difficulty on purchase intention found. The results contribute to choice overload and AR literature by demonstrating how AR’s virtual experience affects decision-making and, more specifically, choice difficulty.

Suggested Citation

  • Maaike Ven & Lieve Doucé & Kim Willems & Felitsa Rademakers & Malaika Brengman & Philippine Loupiac, 2025. "Augmenting the reality of decision-making: Comparing and combining product experiences’ influence on choice difficulty and mental imagery," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 35(1), pages 1-25, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:elmark:v:35:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s12525-025-00801-y
    DOI: 10.1007/s12525-025-00801-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12525-025-00801-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s12525-025-00801-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Augmented reality; Virtual product experience; Decision-making; Choice overload; Choice difficulty; Mental imagery;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M31 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Marketing and Advertising - - - Marketing

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:elmark:v:35:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s12525-025-00801-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.