IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/decisn/v50y2023i4d10.1007_s40622-023-00370-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Digital elixir for healthcare: market intelligence and policy implications

Author

Listed:
  • Naveen R. Gowda

    (All India Institute of Medical Sciences)

  • H. Vikas

    (All India Institute of Medical Sciences)

  • Sidhartha Satpathy

    (All India Institute of Medical Sciences)

  • Anjali Ramaswamy

    (All India Institute of Medical Sciences)

  • Meghana Prabhu

    (Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences (ILBS))

  • Atul Kumar

    (Employees’ State Insurance Corporation, Head Quarter)

  • Ananth Kini

    (Military Hospital Kamptee, Armed Forces Medical Services)

  • Angel Rajan Singh

    (All India Institute of Medical Sciences)

  • D. K. Sharma

    (All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS))

  • Devashish Desai

    (All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS))

  • J. B. Sharma

    (All India Institute of Medical Sciences)

  • Praveen R. Gowda

    (Toyota Kirloskar Motors Private Limited)

  • Rajkumar

    (Army Medical Corps)

  • Bharath Gopinath

    (All India Institute of Medical Sciences)

  • Chandrashekhar Huded

    (Gulbarga Institute of Medical Sciences)

  • K. P. Sowmya

    (Siddhartha Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Institute)

  • T. K. Divya

    (Sapthagiri Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Institute)

  • Khyati Vakharia

    (Vardhaman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital)

  • Somanath Viswanath

    (Atos India)

  • Dhayal C. John

    (All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS))

  • Neeraj Gudipati

    (Indian Institute of Information Technology (IIIT))

Abstract

There is an increasing emphasis on digital health. However, success of digital health depends on voluntary adoption, which requires good product–market fit for a wide range of users. A national-level survey through snowball sampling was conducted from November 2020 to March 2021 among all MBBS doctors willing to participate. A total of 1010 doctors from different sectors, locations, qualifications with wide range of experience and patient load participated. Doctors from across the board felt going digital would entail long learning curves, additional workload, more screen time and that they do not improve overall quality of care. Majority feel digital solutions do not help in increasing net revenue and consequently prefer free-of-cost digital solutions. Among those willing to pay, onetime investment for hardware/equipment (38%) followed by annual subscription for software licenses (34%) are the preferred modalities. Seventy-four percent of doctors expressed not being comfortable with government providing digital solutions or controlling the data. In order to make the findings more practical and relevant, digital health adoption curve and market intelligence grid have been proposed. Digital health companies can use the adoption curve to understand how adoption can fluctuate with cost, ease of use and data policy. The grid can help companies identify the requirements of their target segment of doctors and therefore achieve better product–market fit.

Suggested Citation

  • Naveen R. Gowda & H. Vikas & Sidhartha Satpathy & Anjali Ramaswamy & Meghana Prabhu & Atul Kumar & Ananth Kini & Angel Rajan Singh & D. K. Sharma & Devashish Desai & J. B. Sharma & Praveen R. Gowda & , 2023. "Digital elixir for healthcare: market intelligence and policy implications," DECISION: Official Journal of the Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, Springer;Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, vol. 50(4), pages 489-500, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:decisn:v:50:y:2023:i:4:d:10.1007_s40622-023-00370-z
    DOI: 10.1007/s40622-023-00370-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40622-023-00370-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40622-023-00370-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chhabi Lal Ranabhat & Mihajlo Jakovljevic, 2023. "Sustainable Health Care Provision Worldwide: Is There a Necessary Trade-Off between Cost and Quality?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-11, January.
    2. Mita Choudhury & Pritam Datta, 2019. "Private Hospitals in Health Insurance Network in India: A Reflection for Implementation of Ayushman Bharat," Working Papers id:13009, eSocialSciences.
    3. Choudhury, Mita & Datta, Pritam, 2019. "Private Hospitals in Health Insurance Network in India: A Reflection for Implementation of Ayushman Bharat," Working Papers 19/254, National Institute of Public Finance and Policy.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jaison Joseph & Hari Sankar D. & Devaki Nambiar, 2021. "Empanelment of health care facilities under Ayushman Bharat Pradhan Mantri Jan Arogya Yojana (AB PM-JAY) in India," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(5), pages 1-16, May.
    2. Choudhury, Mita & Tripathi, Shruti & Dubey, Jay Dev, 2019. "Experiences with Government Sponsored Health Insurance Schemes in Indian States: A Fiscal Perspective," Working Papers 19/283, National Institute of Public Finance and Policy.
    3. Anandita Sharma, 2023. "Social Health Protection and Publicly Funded Health Insurance Schemes in India: The Right Way Forward?," The Indian Journal of Labour Economics, Springer;The Indian Society of Labour Economics (ISLE), vol. 66(2), pages 513-534, June.
    4. Chakraborty, Lekha & Nayyar, Veena & Jain, Komal, 2019. "The Political Economy of Gender Budgeting: Empirical Evidence from India," Working Papers 19/256, National Institute of Public Finance and Policy.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:decisn:v:50:y:2023:i:4:d:10.1007_s40622-023-00370-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.