IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/coopap/v71y2018i3d10.1007_s10589-018-0022-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On inexact ADMMs with relative error criteria

Author

Listed:
  • Jiaxin Xie

    (Chinese Academy of Sciences)

Abstract

In this paper, we develop two inexact alternating direction methods of multipliers (ADMMs) with relative error criteria for which only a few parameters are needed to control the error tolerance. In many practical applications, the numerical performance is often improved if a larger step-length is used. Hence in this paper we also consider to seek a larger step-length to update the Lagrangian multiplier for better numerical efficiency. Specifically, if we only allow one subproblem in the classic ADMM to be solved inexactly by a certain relative error criterion, then a larger step-length can be used to update the Lagrangian multiplier. Related convergence analysis of those proposed algorithms is also established under the assumption that the solution set to the KKT system of the problem is not empty. Numerical experiments on solving total variation (TV)-based image denosing and analysis sparse recovery problems are provided to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed methods and the advantage of taking a larger step-length.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiaxin Xie, 2018. "On inexact ADMMs with relative error criteria," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 71(3), pages 743-765, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:coopap:v:71:y:2018:i:3:d:10.1007_s10589-018-0022-2
    DOI: 10.1007/s10589-018-0022-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10589-018-0022-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10589-018-0022-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. M. H. Xu & T. Wu, 2011. "A Class of Linearized Proximal Alternating Direction Methods," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 151(2), pages 321-337, November.
    2. M. V. Solodov & B. F. Svaiter, 2000. "An Inexact Hybrid Generalized Proximal Point Algorithm and Some New Results on the Theory of Bregman Functions," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 25(2), pages 214-230, May.
    3. Min Li & Li-Zhi Liao & Xiaoming Yuan, 2013. "Inexact Alternating Direction Methods of Multipliers with Logarithmic–Quadratic Proximal Regularization," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 159(2), pages 412-436, November.
    4. Jonathan Eckstein & Wang Yao, 2017. "Approximate ADMM algorithms derived from Lagrangian splitting," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 68(2), pages 363-405, November.
    5. M. H. Xu, 2007. "Proximal Alternating Directions Method for Structured Variational Inequalities," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 134(1), pages 107-117, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. William W. Hager & Hongchao Zhang, 2020. "Convergence rates for an inexact ADMM applied to separable convex optimization," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 77(3), pages 729-754, December.
    2. William W. Hager & Hongchao Zhang, 2019. "Inexact alternating direction methods of multipliers for separable convex optimization," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 73(1), pages 201-235, May.
    3. Vando A. Adona & Max L. N. Gonçalves & Jefferson G. Melo, 2019. "A Partially Inexact Proximal Alternating Direction Method of Multipliers and Its Iteration-Complexity Analysis," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 182(2), pages 640-666, August.
    4. Le Thi Khanh Hien & Duy Nhat Phan & Nicolas Gillis, 2022. "Inertial alternating direction method of multipliers for non-convex non-smooth optimization," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 83(1), pages 247-285, September.
    5. Jonathan Eckstein & Paulo Silva, 2010. "Proximal methods for nonlinear programming: double regularization and inexact subproblems," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 46(2), pages 279-304, June.
    6. Z. K. Jiang & X. M. Yuan, 2010. "New Parallel Descent-like Method for Solving a Class of Variational Inequalities," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 145(2), pages 311-323, May.
    7. Maicon Marques Alves & Samara Costa Lima, 2017. "An Inexact Spingarn’s Partial Inverse Method with Applications to Operator Splitting and Composite Optimization," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 175(3), pages 818-847, December.
    8. Ceng, Lu-Chuan & Yao, Jen-Chih, 2007. "Approximate proximal methods in vector optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 183(1), pages 1-19, November.
    9. M. Marques Alves & Jonathan Eckstein & Marina Geremia & Jefferson G. Melo, 2020. "Relative-error inertial-relaxed inexact versions of Douglas-Rachford and ADMM splitting algorithms," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 75(2), pages 389-422, March.
    10. V. A. Adona & M. L. N. Gonçalves & J. G. Melo, 2020. "An inexact proximal generalized alternating direction method of multipliers," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 76(3), pages 621-647, July.
    11. Deren Han & Defeng Sun & Liwei Zhang, 2018. "Linear Rate Convergence of the Alternating Direction Method of Multipliers for Convex Composite Programming," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 43(2), pages 622-637, May.
    12. Jonathan Eckstein & Wang Yao, 2017. "Approximate ADMM algorithms derived from Lagrangian splitting," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 68(2), pages 363-405, November.
    13. Caihua Chen & Min Li & Xiaoming Yuan, 2015. "Further Study on the Convergence Rate of Alternating Direction Method of Multipliers with Logarithmic-quadratic Proximal Regularization," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 166(3), pages 906-929, September.
    14. Yunier Bello-Cruz & Max L. N. Gonçalves & Nathan Krislock, 2023. "On FISTA with a relative error rule," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 84(2), pages 295-318, March.
    15. Nils Langenberg, 2012. "An Interior Proximal Method for a Class of Quasimonotone Variational Inequalities," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 155(3), pages 902-922, December.
    16. L. C. Ceng & B. S. Mordukhovich & J. C. Yao, 2010. "Hybrid Approximate Proximal Method with Auxiliary Variational Inequality for Vector Optimization," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 146(2), pages 267-303, August.
    17. Xin Jiang & Lieven Vandenberghe, 2023. "Bregman Three-Operator Splitting Methods," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 196(3), pages 936-972, March.
    18. Nils Langenberg, 2010. "Pseudomonotone operators and the Bregman Proximal Point Algorithm," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 47(4), pages 537-555, August.
    19. Jianchao Bai & William W. Hager & Hongchao Zhang, 2022. "An inexact accelerated stochastic ADMM for separable convex optimization," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 81(2), pages 479-518, March.
    20. Radu Ioan Bot & Dang-Khoa Nguyen, 2020. "The Proximal Alternating Direction Method of Multipliers in the Nonconvex Setting: Convergence Analysis and Rates," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 45(2), pages 682-712, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:coopap:v:71:y:2018:i:3:d:10.1007_s10589-018-0022-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.