IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/comaot/v19y2013i3d10.1007_s10588-012-9140-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The best papers from BRIMS 2011: models of users and teams interacting

Author

Listed:
  • Frank E. Ritter
  • William G. Kennedy
  • Bradley J. Best

Abstract

This special issue is similar to our previous special issues (Kennedy et al. in Comput. Math. Organ. Theory 16(3):217–219, 2010; 17(3):225–228, 2011) in that it includes articles based on the award winning conference papers of the, here, 2011 BRiMS Annual Conference. These articles were reviewed by the editors, extended to journal article length, and then peer-reviewed and revised before being accepted. The articles include a new way to evaluate designs of interfaces for safety critical systems (Bolton in Comput. Math. Organ. Theory, 2012), an article that extends our understanding of how to model situation awareness (SA) in a cognitive architecture (Rodgers et al. in Comput. Math. Organ. Theory, 2012), an article that presents electroencephalography (EEG) data used to derive dynamic neurophysiologic models of engagement in teamwork (Stevens et al. in Comput. Math. Organ. Theory, 2012), and an article that demonstrates using machine learning to generate models and an example application of that tool (Best in Comput. Math. Organ. Theory, 2012). After presenting a brief summary of each paper we will see some recurrent themes of task analysis, team and individual models, spatial reasoning, usability issues, and particularly that they are models that interact with each other or systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Frank E. Ritter & William G. Kennedy & Bradley J. Best, 2013. "The best papers from BRIMS 2011: models of users and teams interacting," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 283-287, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:comaot:v:19:y:2013:i:3:d:10.1007_s10588-012-9140-z
    DOI: 10.1007/s10588-012-9140-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10588-012-9140-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10588-012-9140-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David Reitter & Christian Lebiere, 2010. "A cognitive model of spatial path-planning," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 220-245, September.
    2. Lanny Lin & Michael A. Goodrich, 2010. "A Bayesian approach to modeling lost person behaviors based on terrain features in Wilderness Search and Rescue," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 300-323, September.
    3. Shane T. Mueller & Benjamin Simpkins & George Anno & Corey K. Fallon & Owen Price & Gene E. McClellan, 2011. "Adapting the task-taxon-task methodology to model the impact of chemical protective gear," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 251-271, September.
    4. William G. Kennedy & Frank E. Ritter & Bradley J. Best, 2011. "Behavioral representation in modeling and simulation introduction to CMOT special issue—BRiMS 2010," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 225-228, September.
    5. Rashaad E. T. Jones & Erik S. Connors & Mary E. Mossey & John R. Hyatt & Neil J. Hansen & Mica R. Endsley, 2011. "Using fuzzy cognitive mapping techniques to model situation awareness for army infantry platoon leaders," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 272-295, September.
    6. Jerry Ball & Christopher Myers & Andrea Heiberg & Nancy J. Cooke & Michael Matessa & Mary Freiman & Stuart Rodgers, 2010. "The synthetic teammate project," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 271-299, September.
    7. L. Richard Moore, 2011. "Cognitive model exploration and optimization: a new challenge for computational science," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 296-313, September.
    8. Jonathan H. Morgan & Geoffrey P. Morgan & Frank E. Ritter, 2010. "A preliminary model of participation for small groups," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 246-270, September.
    9. Patrick Jungkunz & Christian J. Darken, 2011. "A computational model for human eye-movements in military simulations," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 229-250, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. William G. Kennedy & Robert St. Amant & David Reitter, 2016. "Behavior representation in modeling and simulation: introduction to CMOT special issue: BRiMS 2013," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 1-3, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. William G. Kennedy & Frank E. Ritter & Bradley J. Best, 2011. "Behavioral representation in modeling and simulation introduction to CMOT special issue—BRiMS 2010," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 225-228, September.
    2. Frank E. Ritter & Farnaz Tehranchi & Christopher L. Dancy & Sue E. Kase, 2020. "Some futures for cognitive modeling and architectures: design patterns for including better interaction with the world, moderators, and improved model to data fits (and so can you)," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 26(3), pages 278-306, September.
    3. Changkun Zhao & Ryan Kaulakis & Jonathan H. Morgan & Jeremiah W. Hiam & Frank E. Ritter & Joesph Sanford & Geoffrey P. Morgan, 2015. "Building social networks out of cognitive blocks: factors of interest in agent-based socio-cognitive simulations," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 115-149, June.
    4. David Reitter & Christian Lebiere, 2010. "A cognitive model of spatial path-planning," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 220-245, September.
    5. Terence K. Tan & Christian J. Darken, 2015. "Learning and prediction of relational time series," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 210-241, June.
    6. Matthew L. Bolton, 2013. "Automatic validation and failure diagnosis of human-device interfaces using task analytic models and model checking," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 288-312, September.
    7. Minaei, Negin, 2014. "Do modes of transportation and GPS affect cognitive maps of Londoners?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 162-180.
    8. Christopher L. Dancy & Frank E. Ritter & Keith A. Berry & Laura C. Klein, 2015. "Using a cognitive architecture with a physiological substrate to represent effects of a psychological stressor on cognition," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 90-114, March.
    9. Geoffrey P. Morgan & Kathleen M. Carley, 2014. "Comparing hiring strategies in a committee with similarity biases," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 1-19, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:comaot:v:19:y:2013:i:3:d:10.1007_s10588-012-9140-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.