IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/climat/v178y2025i6d10.1007_s10584-025-03936-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Climate media amidst technopolitical change: challenges, transformations, and new directions for research

Author

Listed:
  • Rachel Wetts

    (Brown University)

  • Hanna E. Morris

    (University of Toronto)

  • Maxwell Boykoff

    (Cooperative Institute for Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado Boulder)

  • Brenda McNally

    (University of Galway, School of English, Media and Creative Arts)

  • James Painter

    (Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism, Oxford University)

  • Mary Sanford

    (CMCC Foundation - Euro-Mediterranean Center On Climate Change
    RFF-CMCC European Institute On Economics and the Environment)

  • Emily P. Diamond

    (University of Rhode Island)

  • Marc Esteve-del-Valle

    (University of Groningen)

  • Loredana Loy

    (University of Miami)

  • Kelly E. Perry

    (Brown University School of Public Health
    Duke University)

  • Urooj S. Raja

    (Loyola University Chicago)

  • Robin Tschötschel

    (Hamburg University)

Abstract

In this essay, we seek to provide a meta-level view of research on mediated climate change communication, taking stock of its achievements, historical and contemporary challenges, and future directions. While existing climate media scholarship has generated important insights to guide research and practice, recent empirical developments and technopolitical transformations challenge the traditional structure of climate media research. Historically, this research developed a tripartite structure where scholars have tended to focus on one of three distinct phases of the mediated communication process: (1) the production of narratives, frames, images, and other forms of communication about climate change; (2) the content and dissemination of these communication artifacts by and across media industries and institutions; and (3) these artifacts’ reception by and effects on policymakers, partisans, and publics. However, recent developments in communication technologies, media ecosystems, and the broader political landscape—including the increasing importance of social media and AI, new forms of climate obstruction, and rising antidemocratic forces across borders—have made these traditional lines of demarcation increasingly unworkable. While the lines of demarcation between production, dissemination, and reception are increasingly blurred in important new empirical phenomena, each has remained central in many scholarly works and the development of research questions. This persistence of the tripartite model, we argue, has caused climate media research to be slow to reflect the shifting dynamics of mediated climate communication today. After describing and analyzing the structural challenges that make doing more comprehensive climate media research so challenging, we conclude with proposals for new directions for scholarship that can help future research more fully contend with recent technopolitical transformations and move towards actionable research that is capable of grappling with and motivating robust responses to the complexities of climate change amid mounting authoritarian threats.

Suggested Citation

  • Rachel Wetts & Hanna E. Morris & Maxwell Boykoff & Brenda McNally & James Painter & Mary Sanford & Emily P. Diamond & Marc Esteve-del-Valle & Loredana Loy & Kelly E. Perry & Urooj S. Raja & Robin Tsch, 2025. "Climate media amidst technopolitical change: challenges, transformations, and new directions for research," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 178(6), pages 1-23, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:climat:v:178:y:2025:i:6:d:10.1007_s10584-025-03936-1
    DOI: 10.1007/s10584-025-03936-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10584-025-03936-1
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10584-025-03936-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Susanne C. Moser, 2016. "Reflections on climate change communication research and practice in the second decade of the 21st century: what more is there to say?," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 7(3), pages 345-369, May.
    2. Mary Sanford & Jamie Lorimer, 2022. "Veganuary and the vegan sausage (t)rolls: conflict and commercial engagement in online climate-diet discourse," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-13, December.
    3. Mike S. Schäfer & James Painter, 2021. "Climate journalism in a changing media ecosystem: Assessing the production of climate change‐related news around the world," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 12(1), January.
    4. Jonas Meckling & Bentley B. Allan, 2020. "The evolution of ideas in global climate policy," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 10(5), pages 434-438, May.
    5. Rachel Wetts & James Painter & Loredana Loy, 2024. "The IPCC in the hybrid public sphere: divergent responses to climate mitigation solutions in mainstream and social media," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 177(12), pages 1-24, December.
    6. Candis Callison, 2021. "Refusing more empire: utility, colonialism, and Indigenous knowing," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 167(3), pages 1-14, August.
    7. Joshua Ettinger & Peter Walton & James Painter & Thomas DiBlasi, 2021. "Climate of hope or doom and gloom? Testing the climate change hope vs. fear communications debate through online videos," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 164(1), pages 1-19, January.
    8. Loredana Loy, 2022. "Experts and climate change politicisation. A case study of the Environmental Protection Agency (1983–2015) [The Micro-Politics of Worthy Homelessness: Interactive Moments in Congressional Hearings]," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 49(5), pages 699-713.
    9. Robert Brulle, 2014. "Institutionalizing delay: foundation funding and the creation of U.S. climate change counter-movement organizations," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 122(4), pages 681-694, February.
    10. Haoran Chu & Janet Z. Yang, 2020. "Risk or Efficacy? How Psychological Distance Influences Climate Change Engagement," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 40(4), pages 758-770, April.
    11. Susanne C. Moser, 2010. "Communicating climate change: history, challenges, process and future directions," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 1(1), pages 31-53, January.
    12. Saffron J. O'Neill & Nicholas Smith, 2014. "Climate change and visual imagery," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 5(1), pages 73-87, January.
    13. Anabela Carvalho, 2010. "Media(ted)discourses and climate change: a focus on political subjectivity and (dis)engagement," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 1(2), pages 172-179, March.
    14. Guy Edwards & Paul K Gellert & Omar Faruque & Kathryn Hochstetler & Pamela D McElwee & Prakash Kaswhan & Ruth E McKie & Carlos Milani & Timmons Roberts & Jonathan Walz, 2023. "Climate obstruction in the Global South: Future research trajectories," PLOS Climate, Public Library of Science, vol. 2(7), pages 1-5, July.
    15. Lauren Feldman & P. Sol Hart, 2018. "Is There Any Hope? How Climate Change News Imagery and Text Influence Audience Emotions and Support for Climate Mitigation Policies," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 38(3), pages 585-602, March.
    16. Daniel A. Chapman & Brian Lickel & Ezra M. Markowitz, 2017. "Reassessing emotion in climate change communication," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 7(12), pages 850-852, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Thiemo Fetzer & Prashant Garg, 2025. "Social and Genetic Ties Drive Skewed Cross-Border Media Coverage of Disasters," Papers 2501.07615, arXiv.org.
    2. Joshua Ettinger & Peter Walton & James Painter & Thomas DiBlasi, 2021. "Climate of hope or doom and gloom? Testing the climate change hope vs. fear communications debate through online videos," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 164(1), pages 1-19, January.
    3. Chris Neale & Maura M. K. Austin & Jenny Roe & Benjamin A. Converse, 2023. "Making people aware of eco-innovations can decrease climate despair," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 176(12), pages 1-21, December.
    4. Dylan Bugden, 2022. "Denial and distrust: explaining the partisan climate gap," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 170(3), pages 1-23, February.
    5. Victoria Wibeck & Tina‐Simone Neset, 2020. "Focus groups and serious gaming in climate change communication research—A methodological review," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 11(5), September.
    6. Antonio Castillo Esparcia & Sara López Gómez, 2021. "Public Opinion about Climate Change in United States, Partisan View and Media Coverage of the 2019 United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP 25) in Madrid," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-19, April.
    7. Unay-Gailhard, İlkay & Lawson, Kati & Brennan, Mark A., 2023. "An examination of digital empathy: When farmers speak for the climate through TikTok," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 102, pages 1-1.
    8. Anthony G. Patt & Elke U. Weber, 2014. "Perceptions and communication strategies for the many uncertainties relevant for climate policy," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 5(2), pages 219-232, March.
    9. Lisette Beek & Manjana Milkoreit & Linda Prokopy & Jason B. Reed & Joost Vervoort & Arjan Wardekker & Roberta Weiner, 2022. "The effects of serious gaming on risk perceptions of climate tipping points," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 170(3), pages 1-23, February.
    10. Kathie M. d'I. Treen & Hywel T. P. Williams & Saffron J. O'Neill, 2020. "Online misinformation about climate change," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 11(5), September.
    11. Harriet Hawkins & Anja Kanngieser, 2017. "Artful climate change communication: overcoming abstractions, insensibilities, and distances," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 8(5), September.
    12. Katharina van Baal & Stephanie Stiel & Peter Schulte, 2023. "Public Perceptions of Climate Change and Health—A Cross-Sectional Survey Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-11, January.
    13. Rachel Wetts & James Painter & Loredana Loy, 2024. "The IPCC in the hybrid public sphere: divergent responses to climate mitigation solutions in mainstream and social media," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 177(12), pages 1-24, December.
    14. Mike S. Schäfer & James Painter, 2021. "Climate journalism in a changing media ecosystem: Assessing the production of climate change‐related news around the world," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 12(1), January.
    15. Jochen Hinkel & Diana Mangalagiu & Alexander Bisaro & J. David Tàbara, 2020. "Transformative narratives for climate action," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 160(4), pages 495-506, June.
    16. Bonan, Jacopo & Curzi, Daniele & D'Adda, Giovanna & Ferro, Simone, 2023. "Climate Change Salience and Electricity Consumption: Evidence from Twitter Activity," RFF Working Paper Series 23-34, Resources for the Future.
    17. Mireille Chiroleu‐Assouline & Thomas P. Lyon, 2020. "Merchants of doubt: Corporate political action when NGO credibility is uncertain," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(2), pages 439-461, April.
    18. Jeremiah Bohr, 2017. "Is it hot in here or is it just me? Temperature anomalies and political polarization over global warming in the American public," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 142(1), pages 271-285, May.
    19. Hamish van der Ven & Yixian Sun, 2021. "Varieties of Crises: Comparing the Politics of COVID-19 and Climate Change," Global Environmental Politics, MIT Press, vol. 21(1), pages 13-22, Winter.
    20. Oliver Lazarus & Sonali McDermid & Jennifer Jacquet, 2021. "The climate responsibilities of industrial meat and dairy producers," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 165(1), pages 1-21, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:climat:v:178:y:2025:i:6:d:10.1007_s10584-025-03936-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.