IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/climat/v172y2022i3d10.1007_s10584-022-03378-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Emission factors from enteric fermentation of different categories of cattle in the Mexican tropics: a comparison between 2006 and 2019 IPCC

Author

Listed:
  • Adriana Rivera-Huerta

    (Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México)

  • María Salud Rubio Lozano

    (Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México)

  • Juan C. Ku-Vera

    (Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán)

  • Leonor Patricia Güereca

    (Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México)

Abstract

Considerable interest has been shown in evaluating methodologies to calculate current enteric methane emissions and using those that produce the most precise results. The objectives of this study were (1) to calculate the emission factors (EFs) for enteric methane produced by different livestock systems in the Mexican tropics using the Tier-2 methodology of the 2006 IPCC and 2019 Refinement to the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories (2019 IPCC); (2) to calculate the Tier-2 EFs using both IPCC versions with the methane conversion factor (Ym) estimated with emission data specific to the Mexican tropics (denoted as Tier-2MX), and (3) to compare the EFs from (2) and (1) based on the Ym specific to the Mexican tropics and the default Ym for the 2006 and 2019 IPCC, respectively. To calculate the EFs and Ym using the Tier-2 methodology, three models of meat production in the tropics were selected: a monoculture system (MC, 6 farms), an intensive silvopastoral system (ISP, 6 farms), and a native silvopastoral system (NSP, 6 farms). Twelve of the selected farms were dual-purpose (meat and milk production), and 6 were used for calf production. The EFs were estimated using two main steps: (1) classification of livestock into subcategories: bulls, lactating cows, dry cows, and replacement heifers; and (2) calculation of the gross energy (MJ day−1) intake as prescribed in Chapter 10, Volume 4 of the IPCC (2006 and 2019). The data showed that high and low productivity could be distinguished using the 2019 IPCC but not the 2006 IPCC. Higher average EFs were generated by Tier-1 than by Tier-2. The Tier-2 EFs were higher than the Tier-2MX EFs. These results confirm that Tier-2 methodologies can enhance existing differences. Additionally, the Tier-2MX EFs for each type of cattle were lower than the Tier-2 and Tier-1 EFs. These results show that it is advisable to use methane yields determined for a particular country or region.

Suggested Citation

  • Adriana Rivera-Huerta & María Salud Rubio Lozano & Juan C. Ku-Vera & Leonor Patricia Güereca, 2022. "Emission factors from enteric fermentation of different categories of cattle in the Mexican tropics: a comparison between 2006 and 2019 IPCC," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 172(3), pages 1-17, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:climat:v:172:y:2022:i:3:d:10.1007_s10584-022-03378-z
    DOI: 10.1007/s10584-022-03378-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10584-022-03378-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10584-022-03378-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Harrison, Matthew T. & McSweeney, Chris & Tomkins, Nigel W. & Eckard, Richard J., 2015. "Improving greenhouse gas emissions intensities of subtropical and tropical beef farming systems using Leucaena leucocephala," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 138-146.
    2. Dario Caro & Ermias Kebreab & Frank M. Mitloehner, 2016. "Mitigation of enteric methane emissions from global livestock systems through nutrition strategies," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 137(3), pages 467-480, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mayberry, Dianne & Bartlett, Harriet & Moss, Jonathan & Davison, Thomas & Herrero, Mario, 2019. "Pathways to carbon-neutrality for the Australian red meat sector," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 13-21.
    2. Stefan Frank & Robert Beach & Petr Havlík & Hugo Valin & Mario Herrero & Aline Mosnier & Tomoko Hasegawa & Jared Creason & Shaun Ragnauth & Michael Obersteiner, 2018. "Structural change as a key component for agricultural non-CO2 mitigation efforts," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 9(1), pages 1-8, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:climat:v:172:y:2022:i:3:d:10.1007_s10584-022-03378-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.