IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/circec/v5y2025i4d10.1007_s43615-025-00547-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A System Dynamics Prospective Analysis of Extended Producer Responsibility Policies: A Business for a Few

Author

Listed:
  • Jorge Castrillon-Ocampo

    (University of Antioquia)

  • Sebastián Jaén

    (University of Antioquia)

  • Pablo Maya-Duque

    (University of Antioquia)

Abstract

This paper presents a prospective analysis of the evolution of the Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) system for waste management in developing countries, using the case of Colombia’s packaging sector. The system dynamics model highlights two distinct phases in the evolution of the EPR system: before and after achieving maximum collection and certification targets. In the pre-target phase, the simulation shows a boom in the creation of producer organizations (PROs), collectors, and transformers, driven by increasing demand. This growth is influenced by the magnitude of collection goals, stepwise increases, and the level of vertical integration between PROs and collectors, which enhances profitability. However, entry barriers and the inability of some firms to cover regional waste collection eventually slow this boom. In the post-target phase, the market experiences firm exits and cost reductions, reaching an equilibrium. This trend is further accelerated if producers reduce waste, leading to market concentration, especially among transformers. The analysis suggests that continuous increases in collection and transformation targets are necessary to maintain market competitiveness, avoiding dominance by a few firms. The findings emphasize the importance of local conditions in shaping EPR policy outcomes. The proliferation of PROs in Colombia differs from trends in other countries, illustrating the influence of policy parameters on market behavior. System dynamics prove to be a valuable tool for simulating future scenarios, informing policy design, and understanding the impact of EPR on eco-design, circular economy practices, and regulatory compliance. The study advocates for more robust decision-support tools to enhance EPR policy effectiveness an avoid market concentration and high costs.

Suggested Citation

  • Jorge Castrillon-Ocampo & Sebastián Jaén & Pablo Maya-Duque, 2025. "A System Dynamics Prospective Analysis of Extended Producer Responsibility Policies: A Business for a Few," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 5(4), pages 3317-3342, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:circec:v:5:y:2025:i:4:d:10.1007_s43615-025-00547-x
    DOI: 10.1007/s43615-025-00547-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s43615-025-00547-x
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s43615-025-00547-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Massarutto, Antonio, 2014. "The long and winding road to resource efficiency – An interdisciplinary perspective on extended producer responsibility," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 11-21.
    2. Carlos J. Gallego & Juan C. David & I. N. Gomez-Miranda & Sebastián Jaén, 2023. "Quantitative Analysis of Colombian Waste Picker’s Profile," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-15, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marco Compagnoni & Marco Grazzi & Fabio Pieri & Chiara Tomasi, 2025. "Extended Producer Responsibility and Trade Flows in Waste: The Case of Batteries," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 88(1), pages 43-76, January.
    2. Francesco Colelli & Edoardo Croci, 2021. "Assessment of environmental and economic benefits of packaging waste system in Italy," ECONOMICS AND POLICY OF ENERGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2021(1), pages 37-58.
    3. Jakob T. Pruess, 2023. "Unraveling the complexity of extended producer responsibility policy mix design, implementation, and transfer dynamics in the European Union," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 27(6), pages 1500-1520, December.
    4. Sun, Xi & Neuhoff, Karsten, 2025. "Nobody decides for all — Modeling incentives and policies for closing the material loop," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    5. Garth Hickle, 2017. "Extending the Boundaries: An Assessment of the Integration of Extended Producer Responsibility Within Corporate Social Responsibility," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(1), pages 112-124, January.
    6. Eugénie Joltreau, 2022. "Extended Producer Responsibility, Packaging Waste Reduction and Eco-design," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 83(3), pages 527-578, November.
    7. Hickle, Garth T., 2014. "An examination of governance within extended producer responsibility policy regimes in North America," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 55-65.
    8. Marco Compagnoni & Marco Grazzi & Fabio Pieri & Chiara Tomasi, 2025. "Extended Producer Responsibility and Trade Flows in Waste: The Case of Batteries," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 88(1), pages 43-76, January.
    9. Karima AFIF & Bocar Samba BA & Eugénie JOLTREAU, 2024. "Tax-subsidy schemes for recycling when quantity and quality of waste matter," Working Papers 2024.02, FAERE - French Association of Environmental and Resource Economists.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:circec:v:5:y:2025:i:4:d:10.1007_s43615-025-00547-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.