IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/chinre/v18y2025i5d10.1007_s12187-025-10287-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fiscal Practices in Alleviating Child Poverty: an Analysis of OECD Countries

Author

Listed:
  • Nilay Akbulut

    (Bursa Uludag University)

  • Mehmet Yüce

    (Bursa Uludag University)

Abstract

Child poverty is defined as individuals who lack the material, spiritual and emotional resources necessary for survival and development, who cannot benefit from their rights and who cannot fully realise their potential. In countries with low rates of child poverty, financial aid for children is at the forefront. However, in countries with high rates of child poverty, there is little or no financial assistance. The study is important in terms of revealing the relationship between fiscal practices and the elimination of child poverty and suggesting policies in line with the results. The aim of the study is to quantitatively analyse the importance of fiscal practices on child poverty rates within the international framework. Fiscal practices subject to the research are child cash tax benefits, paid parental leave and public expenditures for social programmes. Unemployment insurance, unemployment rate, disability sickness insurance, GDP, proportion of children living only with their mothers and youth population are other variables whose effects on child poverty rates will be observed. The analysis was carried out using panel data least squares regression method with data covering 28 OECD countries between 2001 and 2022. As a result of the research, it is observed that child cash tax assistance and public expenditures for social programmes variables have positive effects on the elimination of child poverty. Paid parental leave is a policy that helps working mothers to reduce the difficulties they face when their baby is born. The absence of paid parental leave leads to financial hardship for the mother and thus to a decrease in the welfare of the baby. However, our study finds that paid parental leave does not have a significant impact on the elimination of child poverty according to these two variables. As a result of the study; a 10 per cent increase in family cash tax benefits will reduce the child poverty rate by 5 per cent. A 10-week increase in paid parental leave would reduce the child poverty rate by 0.1 per cent. An increase of USD 1000 per child in public expenditure on social programmes would reduce the child poverty rate by 1.2%. Only increases in the rates determined in these financial applications will reduce the child poverty rate by 6 per cent. For a country with a child poverty rate of 10 per cent, it is possible for the child poverty rate to fall to 4 per cent when these fiscal practices are implemented.

Suggested Citation

  • Nilay Akbulut & Mehmet Yüce, 2025. "Fiscal Practices in Alleviating Child Poverty: an Analysis of OECD Countries," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 18(5), pages 2157-2181, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:chinre:v:18:y:2025:i:5:d:10.1007_s12187-025-10287-x
    DOI: 10.1007/s12187-025-10287-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12187-025-10287-x
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s12187-025-10287-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:chinre:v:18:y:2025:i:5:d:10.1007_s12187-025-10287-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.