IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/chinre/v12y2019i2d10.1007_s12187-018-9527-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Freely Expressed Views: Methodological Challenges for the Right of the Child to be Heard

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel Stoecklin

    (University of Geneva (Valais Campus))

Abstract

The methodological challenges in the research on children’s subjective understandings of well-being are very close to the ones surrounding the implementation of the right of the child to be heard. Therefore, identification of the factors favouring or impeding children’s freely expressed views on the one hand, and preliminary results of research on children’s subjective well-being on the other hand, reciprocally inform each other. The right to be heard is approached from the perspective of capabilities (Stoecklin & Bonvin 2014) identifying factors that are converting this formal freedom into real freedom. They highlight preliminary results of a qualitative study conducted in Switzerland along the procotol of the Child’s Subjective Well-Being study (Hunner-Kreisel et al. 2016). The inclusion of a participative research tool, the “actor’s system” (Stoecklin 2013), has allowed to concentrate on children’s subjective understandings of their experience. The results are not analysed in terms of statistical representativeness, but rather in terms of « structural » features they allow to highlight. The endeavour is methodological. The analysis shows that language itself can be a conversion factor in the implementation of the right to be heard, and similarly a methodological trap inducing specific translations of children’s voices into the official “vocabulary” of well-being. Research protocols should therefore be adapted to the evolving capacities of children, considering that well-being is not given state but rather a subjective feeling stemming from processual social dynamics in which children play a part, even when they have little voice.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel Stoecklin, 2019. "Freely Expressed Views: Methodological Challenges for the Right of the Child to be Heard," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 12(2), pages 569-588, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:chinre:v:12:y:2019:i:2:d:10.1007_s12187-018-9527-6
    DOI: 10.1007/s12187-018-9527-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12187-018-9527-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s12187-018-9527-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Christine Gervais & Johanne Thomson-Sweeny & Naïmé Daoust-Zidane & Maude Campeau & Isabel Côté, 2024. "Metaphorical Dialogue: an Innovative Strategy for Capturing Children’s Experience of Subjective Well-being," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 17(1), pages 419-443, February.
    2. Mónica Domínguez-Serrano & Lucía del Moral-Espín, 2022. "The Capability Approach and Child Well-Being: A Systematic Literature Review," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 15(6), pages 2043-2063, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:chinre:v:12:y:2019:i:2:d:10.1007_s12187-018-9527-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.