IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/ariqol/v20y2025i3d10.1007_s11482-025-10463-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Are Children's Self-Reports and Proxy-Reports of Health Utility Agreed? A School-Based Study in China using the EQ-5D-Y and CHU-9D

Author

Listed:
  • Yan Li

    (China Pharmaceutical University)

  • Yanqiu Chen

    (China Pharmaceutical University)

  • Jize Sun

    (China Pharmaceutical University)

  • Mingyu Jiang

    (China Pharmaceutical University)

  • Aixia Ma

    (China Pharmaceutical University
    China Pharmaceutical University)

  • Xuejing Jin

    (Beijing University of Chinese Medicine)

  • Pingyu Chen

    (China Pharmaceutical University
    China Pharmaceutical University)

Abstract

Objective: This study investigated a general Chinese child population aged 7–8 years with the EuroQol 5-Dimension Youth Version (EQ-5D-Y) and Child Health Utility 9D (CHU-9D) instruments, aiming to examine the agreement between self-reports and proxy-reports across various dimensions and overall health utility values, as well as to explore potential factors that may affect the agreement and utility values. Methods: Data were collected from second-grade students aged 7–8 in four schools in Guangxi and Guizhou provinces, China. Children and their proxies independently completed their respective versions of the questionnaires, including the EQ-5D-Y, the CHU-9D, and other socio-demographic information. The agreement between self-reports and proxy-reports in various dimensions was assessed using agreement rate and Adjusted Consistency (AC) value. Bland–Altman (BA) plots and Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) were utilized to analyze the agreement of utility values. Subgroup analyses of ICC and multiple linear regression analysis were conducted to explore factors influencing the agreement between self-reports and proxy-reports. Results: A total of 369 pairs of valid questionnaires were collected from both children and proxies. The AC values for various dimensions showed good agreement between children and proxies for physical function dimensions, but poorer agreement for subjective social and psychological function dimensions. BA plots revealed significant overestimation of children's utility values by both EQ-5D-Y and CHU-9D proxy-reports compared to self-reports. The ICC values for self-reported and proxy-reported utilities were 0.130 for the EQ-5D-Y and 0.295 for the CHU-9D. Subgroup analysis revealed that mothers had higher ICC values and better agreement with children compared to fathers. Moreover, children's health conditions, parental marital status, and family's highest education level impacted agreement results. Conclusions: For the general child population aged 7–8 years in China, the agreement between self-reported and proxy-reported utilities is weak, particularly in subjective social and psychological dimensions, with proxy-reports significantly overestimating children's utility values compared to self-reports. Self-reports and proxy-reports of health utility should be considered complementary rather than interchangeable. The findings provide valuable insights and references for the development of guidelines for self-reports and proxy-reports of children's utility instruments.

Suggested Citation

  • Yan Li & Yanqiu Chen & Jize Sun & Mingyu Jiang & Aixia Ma & Xuejing Jin & Pingyu Chen, 2025. "Are Children's Self-Reports and Proxy-Reports of Health Utility Agreed? A School-Based Study in China using the EQ-5D-Y and CHU-9D," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 20(3), pages 1221-1241, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:ariqol:v:20:y:2025:i:3:d:10.1007_s11482-025-10463-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s11482-025-10463-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11482-025-10463-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11482-025-10463-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Diana Khanna & Jyoti Khadka & Christine Mpundu-Kaambwa & Kiri Lay & Remo Russo & Julie Ratcliffe, 2022. "Are We Agreed? Self- Versus Proxy-Reporting of Paediatric Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) Using Generic Preference-Based Measures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 40(11), pages 1043-1067, November.
    2. Chung-Ping Cheng & Wei-Ming Luh & Ai-Lun Yang & Chia-Ting Su & Chung-Ying Lin, 2016. "Agreement of Children and Parents Scores on Chinese Version of Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory Version 4.0: Further Psychometric Development," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 11(3), pages 891-906, September.
    3. Zhihao Yang & Jie Jiang & Pei Wang & Xuejing Jin & Jing Wu & Yu Fang & Da Feng & Xiaoyu Xi & Shunping Li & Mingxia Jing & Bin Zheng & Weidong Huang & Nan Luo, 2022. "Estimating an EQ-5D-Y-3L Value Set for China," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 40(2), pages 147-155, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yan Li & Yanqiu Chen & Jize Sun & Mingyu Jiang & Aixia Ma & Tiantian Tao & Pingyu Chen, 2025. "Comparison of the EQ-5D-Y and the CHU-9D instruments in a general child population based on self-reports and proxy-reports," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 26(4), pages 577-588, June.
    2. Powell, Philip A. & Rowen, Donna & Keetharuth, Anju & Mukuria, Clara & Shah, Koonal, 2024. "Who should value children's health and how? An international Delphi study," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 355(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:ariqol:v:20:y:2025:i:3:d:10.1007_s11482-025-10463-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.