IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/annopr/v289y2020i1d10.1007_s10479-020-03542-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Operations research methods for estimating the population size of neuron types

Author

Listed:
  • Sarojini M. Attili

    (George Mason University)

  • Sean T. Mackesey

    (George Mason University)

  • Giorgio A. Ascoli

    (George Mason University)

Abstract

Understanding brain computation requires assembling a complete catalog of its architectural components. Although the brain is organized into several anatomical and functional regions, it is ultimately the neurons in every region that are responsible for cognition and behavior. Thus, classifying neuron types throughout the brain and quantifying the population sizes of distinct classes in different regions is a key subject of research in the neuroscience community. The total number of neurons in the brain has been estimated for multiple species, but the definition and population size of each neuron type are still open questions even in common model organisms: the so called “cell census” problem. We propose a methodology that uses operations research principles to estimate the number of neurons in each type based on available information on their distinguishing properties. Thus, assuming a set of neuron type definitions, we provide a solution to the issue of assessing their relative proportions. Specifically, we present a three-step approach that includes literature search, equation generation, and numerical optimization. Solving computationally the set of equations generated by literature mining yields best estimates or most likely ranges for the number of neurons in each type. While this strategy can be applied towards any neural system, we illustrate its usage on the rodent hippocampus.

Suggested Citation

  • Sarojini M. Attili & Sean T. Mackesey & Giorgio A. Ascoli, 2020. "Operations research methods for estimating the population size of neuron types," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 289(1), pages 33-50, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:289:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1007_s10479-020-03542-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s10479-020-03542-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10479-020-03542-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10479-020-03542-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Adam Tauman Kalai & Santosh Vempala, 2006. "Simulated Annealing for Convex Optimization," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 31(2), pages 253-266, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Stephen Baumert & Archis Ghate & Seksan Kiatsupaibul & Yanfang Shen & Robert L. Smith & Zelda B. Zabinsky, 2009. "Discrete Hit-and-Run for Sampling Points from Arbitrary Distributions Over Subsets of Integer Hyperrectangles," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 57(3), pages 727-739, June.
    2. Etienne de Klerk & Monique Laurent, 2018. "Comparison of Lasserre’s Measure-Based Bounds for Polynomial Optimization to Bounds Obtained by Simulated Annealing," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 43(4), pages 1317-1325, November.
    3. Lovász, L. & Deák, I., 2012. "Computational results of an O∗(n4) volume algorithm," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 216(1), pages 152-161.
    4. de Klerk, Etienne & Laurent, Monique, 2017. "Comparison of Lasserre's Measure-based Bounds for Polynomial Optimization to Bounds Obtained by Simulated Annealing," Other publications TiSEM 7a865ba0-bffb-43fb-a376-7, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    5. Zachary Porreca, 2024. "A Note on Uncertainty Quantification for Maximum Likelihood Parameters Estimated with Heuristic Based Optimization Algorithms," Papers 2401.07176, arXiv.org.
    6. Badenbroek, Riley & de Klerk, Etienne, 2022. "Complexity analysis of a sampling-based interior point method for convex optimization," Other publications TiSEM 3d774c6d-8141-4f31-a621-5, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    7. de Klerk, Etienne & Laurent, Monique, 2018. "Comparison of Lasserre's measure-based bounds for polynomial optimization to bounds obtained by simulated annealing," Other publications TiSEM 78f8f496-dc89-413e-864d-f, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    8. Riley Badenbroek & Etienne Klerk, 2022. "Simulated Annealing for Convex Optimization: Rigorous Complexity Analysis and Practical Perspectives," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 194(2), pages 465-491, August.
    9. de Klerk, Etienne & Laurent, Monique, 2019. "A survey of semidefinite programming approaches to the generalized problem of moments and their error analysis," Other publications TiSEM d956492f-3e25-4dda-a5e2-e, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    10. de Klerk, Etienne & Badenbroek, Riley, 2022. "Simulated annealing with hit-and-run for convex optimization: complexity analysis and practical perspectives," Other publications TiSEM 323b4588-65e0-4889-a555-9, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    11. Huseyin Mete & Yanfang Shen & Zelda Zabinsky & Seksan Kiatsupaibul & Robert Smith, 2011. "Pattern discrete and mixed Hit-and-Run for global optimization," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 50(4), pages 597-627, August.
    12. Cyril Bachelard & Apostolos Chalkis & Vissarion Fisikopoulos & Elias Tsigaridas, 2024. "Randomized Control in Performance Analysis and Empirical Asset Pricing," Papers 2403.00009, arXiv.org.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:289:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1007_s10479-020-03542-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.