IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/agrhuv/v42y2025i3d10.1007_s10460-025-10755-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Divergent knowledge and perceptions of insects by organic and non-organic farming in the Ecuadorian Andes

Author

Listed:
  • Tatiana Cardenas

    (Centre d’Ecologie Fonctionnelle et Evolutive, Univ Montpellier, CNRS, EPHE, IRD)

  • Irene Teixidor-Toneu

    (Institut Méditerranéen de Biodiversité et d’Écologie Marine et Continentale (IMBE) - Aix Marseille Université, CNRS, IRD, Avignon Université)

  • Israel Navarrete

    (International Potato Center)

  • Rommel Montufar

    (Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador)

  • Olivier Dangles

    (Centre d’Ecologie Fonctionnelle et Evolutive, Univ Montpellier, CNRS, EPHE, IRD
    Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador)

Abstract

Given the critical role of insects in agriculture, studying farmers’ knowledge of entomofauna and its links to crop management is essential. This study explores how such knowledge, in combination with current farming contexts, can shape the barriers and levers of integrated pest and pollinator management to design pollinator-friendly farming systems. We used mixed methods combining ethnoecological and entomological approaches—including field observations, free lists, and semi-structured interviews—to study the diversity of local agricultural insects and farmers’ knowledge in smallholder farming systems in the Ecuadorian Andes and to assess their perceptions and management of agricultural entomofauna. Our results show that organic farmers recognize and categorize more taxa, especially pollinators, than farmers using pesticides who focus more on taxa considered pests and their harmful functions. Our findings highlight the need for a refined approach of integrated pest and pollinator management, recognizing the diversity of roles insects play in agroecosystems. Strengthening awareness among farmers requires not only bridging gaps between scientific and local knowledge but also promoting a greater emphasis on coexistence with insects rather than solely managing them for their functions. By recognizing diverse knowledge systems, our study underscores the urgency of integrating them to ensure more sustainable agriculture in smallholder contexts.

Suggested Citation

  • Tatiana Cardenas & Irene Teixidor-Toneu & Israel Navarrete & Rommel Montufar & Olivier Dangles, 2025. "Divergent knowledge and perceptions of insects by organic and non-organic farming in the Ecuadorian Andes," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 42(3), pages 2093-2109, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:agrhuv:v:42:y:2025:i:3:d:10.1007_s10460-025-10755-8
    DOI: 10.1007/s10460-025-10755-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10460-025-10755-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10460-025-10755-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:agrhuv:v:42:y:2025:i:3:d:10.1007_s10460-025-10755-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.