Author
Listed:
- Nadja El Benni
(Sustainability Assessment and Agricultural Management Research Division)
- Robert Finger
(ETH Zurich)
- Jeanine Ammann
(Economic Modelling and Policy Analysis Group)
- Judith Irek
(Economic Modelling and Policy Analysis Group)
- Antonia Kaiser
(Economic Modelling and Policy Analysis Group)
- Christian Ritzel
(Economic Modelling and Policy Analysis Group)
- Yanbing Wang
(Economic Modelling and Policy Analysis Group)
- Gabriele Mack
(Economic Modelling and Policy Analysis Group)
Abstract
Agricultural policy in Europe is the subject of extensive debate due to the unmet agri-environmental goals, despite high levels of support. For example, the public is critical of agriculture’s impact on the environment and animal welfare. At the same time, farmers protest due to low incomes and high bureaucracy. This apparent polarisation may hinder progress in agricultural policy reform, and a more nuanced understanding of the perceptions of both non-farmers and farmers is needed. This study systematically compares non-farmers’ and farmers’ preferences and levels of consensus across a comprehensive set of agricultural policy goals using surveys in Switzerland (N = 1668). We also assess the polarisation among farmers, non-farmers, and the entire population. We find consensus and polarisation in the perception of agricultural policy goals among Swiss farmers and the general public. Both prioritise domestic food production and farmers’ income as main policy goals. However, non-farmers put more emphasis on low food prices and agri-environmental goals than farmers. We find strong divides within the farming population, particularly regarding the need to mitigate climate change. Our analysis provides key insights for policymakers. Firstly, the broad consensus on different agricultural policy goals underlines the legitimacy of focusing on multiple objectives that support the multifunctional role of agriculture. Secondly, farmers are not homogeneous but have differing views, particularly regarding environmental objectives, especially those related to reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Policies need to take this heterogeneity into account, for example, by more efficient allocation of agri-environmental payments. Thirdly, while farmers and non-farmers generally agree on the importance of securing farmers’ incomes and food production, there are divergent views when it comes to reducing food prices and environmental impacts. Future agricultural policy reforms must find a balance between environmental goals and safeguarding farmers’ incomes, while also ensuring affordable food prices.
Suggested Citation
Nadja El Benni & Robert Finger & Jeanine Ammann & Judith Irek & Antonia Kaiser & Christian Ritzel & Yanbing Wang & Gabriele Mack, 2025.
"Aligning agricultural policy: discrepancies between public and farmer priorities,"
Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 13(1), pages 1-10, December.
Handle:
RePEc:spr:agfoec:v:13:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1186_s40100-025-00402-5
DOI: 10.1186/s40100-025-00402-5
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:agfoec:v:13:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1186_s40100-025-00402-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.