IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sph/rjedep/v9y2020i3p63-74.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of Financial Performances of SME’s Listed in the Bist Sme Industrial Index by Using TOPSIS Multicriteria Decision Making Method

Author

Listed:
  • Selcuk Kendirli

    (Hitit University, FEAS Department of Finance and Banking)

  • Muhammet Selcuk Kaya

    (Hitit University, FEAS Department of Finance and Banking)

  • Mustafa Bilgin

    (Hitit University, FEAS Department of Finance and Banking)

Abstract

In this study, the financial performances of SMEs listed in the BIST SME Industrial Index are evaluated by using TOPSIS multicriteria decision-making method. The data of the study acquired from annual financial statements that were reported between the 2016-2018 period. Financial performance ranks of SMEs are determined for each year and thus comparative financial performances of SMEs are detected. BIST SME Industrial Index is an index that includes stocks of industrial SMEs traded in BIST Stars, BIST Main, and BIST Emerging Companies markets. SMEs have great importance for the Turkish economy, with their dynamizing roles and with their crucial roles in the regional development and job creation. According to the Turkey Statistical Institute data, Turkish SMEs constitute 99.8 % of all enterprises in Turkey. At the same time, Turkish SMEs provide 72.7% of total employment, 62% of total sales, and 58% of total investments in the Turkish Economy. The Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) is one of the multicriteria decision-making methods that is commonly used in the evaluation of financial performances of firms. The TOPSIS method is based on two main points: the positive ideal solution and the negative ideal solution. With the help of the TOPSIS method, the distances positive ideal solutions and negative ideal solutions of all options are calculated. Options are ranked according to their proximity to the positive ideal solution and their distance to the negative ideal solution.

Suggested Citation

  • Selcuk Kendirli & Muhammet Selcuk Kaya & Mustafa Bilgin, 2020. "Evaluation of Financial Performances of SME’s Listed in the Bist Sme Industrial Index by Using TOPSIS Multicriteria Decision Making Method," Journal of Economic Development, Environment and People, Alliance of Central-Eastern European Universities, vol. 9(3), pages 63-74, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:sph:rjedep:v:9:y:2020:i:3:p:63-74
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://jedep.spiruharet.ro/RePEc/sph/rjedep/JEDEP9_3_2020_671-1719-1-PB.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ahmet Aytekin & Çağlar Karamaşa, 2017. "Analyzing Financial Performance Of Insurance Companies Traded In BIST via Fuzzy Shannon's Entropy Based Fuzzy TOPSIS Methodology," Alphanumeric Journal, Bahadir Fatih Yildirim, vol. 5(1), pages 51-84, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tsvetkova, Liudmila & Okhrimenko, Igor & Belousova, Tamara & Khuzhamov, Leonid, 2022. "Relationship and mutual influence between poverty and insurance in a developing insurance market," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 36(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    SME; Financial Performance; TOPSIS; Multicriteria Decision Making; BIST SME Industrial Index.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D53 - Microeconomics - - General Equilibrium and Disequilibrium - - - Financial Markets
    • G15 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - International Financial Markets
    • G17 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Financial Forecasting and Simulation
    • O16 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Financial Markets; Saving and Capital Investment; Corporate Finance and Governance

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sph:rjedep:v:9:y:2020:i:3:p:63-74. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Rocsana Bucea-Manea-Tonis (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://jedep.spiruharet.ro/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.