IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sos/sosjrn/140212.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Balkan Piyasalarını Hedef Alan Doğal Gaz Boru Hattı Projeleri Arasında Rekabet: NABUCCO-Güney Akım ve Trans-Adriyatik Boru Hattı (TAP) Projeleri Örneği

Author

Listed:
  • Volkan ÖZDEMİR

Abstract

In this article it is argued that historical rivalry for the dominance over Balkan region between Austrian-Russian and Ottoman Empires has been reproduced in the form of geopolitics of natural gas pipelines in the 21st century. In order to transport Azeri gas to South East Europe a harsh competition has been observed between some pipeline projects which have been developed by different actors that seek to pursue their own strategic interests. After a choice by Shah Deniz Consortium, TANAP and TAP projects have become the winners of this competition. During the process of three-lateral energy diplomacy between EU-Russia and Turkey, while Russia and Turkey have been taking into account each other’s positions, at the end of the day the loser had become NABUCCO Project which is supported by Austria and other central EU members.

Suggested Citation

  • Volkan ÖZDEMİR, 2014. "Balkan Piyasalarını Hedef Alan Doğal Gaz Boru Hattı Projeleri Arasında Rekabet: NABUCCO-Güney Akım ve Trans-Adriyatik Boru Hattı (TAP) Projeleri Örneği," Sosyoekonomi Journal, Sosyoekonomi Society, issue 22(22).
  • Handle: RePEc:sos:sosjrn:140212
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dergipark.gov.tr/download/article-file/197797
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Natural Gas; Geopolitics of Pipelines; EU; Russia; Turkey.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Q34 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Nonrenewable Resources and Conservation - - - Natural Resources and Domestic and International Conflicts
    • Q35 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Nonrenewable Resources and Conservation - - - Hydrocarbon Resources
    • Q41 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Energy - - - Demand and Supply; Prices
    • Q48 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Energy - - - Government Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sos:sosjrn:140212. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Aysen Sivrikaya (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.sosyoekonomijournal.org/home.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.