Author
Abstract
Identity theft has emerged as a psychologically consequential form of cybercrime enabled by the proliferation of digital platforms, the expansion of datafication, and the collapse of traditional criminal–victim proximity. As personal identity becomes increasingly externalized through financial accounts, medical records, biometric templates, and algorithmically curated social profiles, offenders exploit cognitive biases, disclosure fatigue, and habituated oversharing to acquire and weaponize personal information. Criminal psychology research demonstrates that social engineering, authority mimicry, and emotional urgency manipulate victims into bypassing rational scrutiny, while cyberpsychology highlights the affective attachment individuals form with their digital representations. Unlike conventional theft, in which tangible objects are removed, identity theft appropriates informational components of the self, enabling prolonged impersonation, reputational distortion, and chronic anxiety that cannot be readily restored. Geographic detachment, encrypted communication channels, and anonymizing technologies reduce offenders’ perceived accountability, encouraged moral disengagement and facilitating mass victimization at minimal personal risk. Victims, confronted with unauthorized transactions or corrupted medical histories, report hypervigilance, loss of digital agency, and destabilization of narrative coherence. Emerging technologies, including Internet of Things devices, deepfake media, decentralized finance, and eventually quantum computing, further expand the attack surface and amplify criminogenic opportunity structures. Meanwhile, jurisdictional fragmentation complicates forensic attribution and legal recourse. Collectively, these developments reveal that traditional, place-based models of personal security are insufficient in networked environments. Safeguarding informational sovereignty requires interdisciplinary approaches that integrate behavioral criminology, cognitive vulnerability assessment, cyberpsychological resilience, and international policy coordination. Understanding identity theft as an ontological, relational, and psychologically persistent violation offers critical insight for prevention, victim support, and regulatory design in the digital epoch.
Suggested Citation
Darrell Norman BURREL, 2025.
"The Cyberpsychology and Criminal Psychology of Cyber Identity Theft and Criminal Reach in the Digital Era,"
RAIS Journal for Social Sciences, Research Association for Interdisciplinary Studies, vol. 9(2), pages 343-360, November.
Handle:
RePEc:smo:jornl1:v:9:y:2025:i:2:p:343-360
Download full text from publisher
Most related items
These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:smo:jornl1:v:9:y:2025:i:2:p:343-360. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Eduard David (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://journal.rais.education/index.php/raiss .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.