IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/smo/jornl1/v9y2025i1p171-176.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Tattooed Officers and Departmental Image: A Content Analysis of Police Department Tattoo Policies in the United States

Author

Listed:
  • Steven M. O’QUINN

    (Capitol Technology University, Laurel, Maryland, USA)

Abstract

Police officers in the United States enjoy the same First Amendment rights as the general public, although courts have ruled repeatedly that those rights may be limited when they conflict with public trust. Police leaders seek to portray their officers positively, encourage professional appearances, and enact policies that seek to prevent extremist affiliations. This study used a qualitative document analysis approach to examine police departments’ publicly available policies, analyze the precision of policy language, identify exclusionary criteria that prohibit certain body art on officers, and determine whether policies are objective and enforceable or left to administrative discretion. The research investigates the changing culture around tattoos and whether police departments can suffer a decline in applicants if they refuse to update tattoo policies in the future, as well as the constitutional overreach departments might face if the policies are too strict and prohibit the rights of the individual officer. The study concludes with recommendations on how police departments can develop and implement fair policies as tattoos become more mainstream and no longer seen as taboo.

Suggested Citation

  • Steven M. O’QUINN, 2025. "Tattooed Officers and Departmental Image: A Content Analysis of Police Department Tattoo Policies in the United States," RAIS Journal for Social Sciences, Research Association for Interdisciplinary Studies, vol. 9(1), pages 171-176, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:smo:jornl1:v:9:y:2025:i:1:p:171-176
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journal.rais.education/index.php/raiss/article/view/265/217
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journal.rais.education/index.php/raiss/article/view/265
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:smo:jornl1:v:9:y:2025:i:1:p:171-176. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Eduard David (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://journal.rais.education/index.php/raiss .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.