IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sja/journl/v9y2020i1p58-64.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Considerations On The Meaning Of The Notion Of €Œworking Time†In The Light Of Recent C.J.E.U. Jurisprudence

Author

Listed:
  • Monica Gheorghe

    (Faculty of Law, “Lucian Blaga†University of Sibiu, Romania)

Abstract

In a series of decisions ruled for preliminary questions, the Court of Justice of the European Union interpreted the notion of “working time†, as well as that of “resting time†, defined by Directive 2003/88/EC of the European Parliament and Council of 4th of November 2003 on certain matters of organizing working time. The objective of the Directive is to guarantee superior protection of workers’ security and health, providing in this respect a series of minimum rules. In terms of these European rules, CJEU had to rule again on certain submitted preliminary questions. This study aims to highlight a part of these decisions and their incidence in the employment relations practice. The national court, in settling a conflict concerning the calculation of the working time of an employee, shall be bound to verify the incidence of absolutions made by the European court in the matter and, subsequently, to apply them for the factual case it settles. Indirectly, the employers are bound to take into account the solutions of the European court.

Suggested Citation

  • Monica Gheorghe, 2020. "Considerations On The Meaning Of The Notion Of €Œworking Time†In The Light Of Recent C.J.E.U. Jurisprudence," Perspectives of Law and Public Administration, Societatea de Stiinte Juridice si Administrative (Society of Juridical and Administrative Sciences), vol. 9(1), pages 58-64, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:sja:journl:v:9:y:2020:i:1:p:58-64
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.adjuris.ro/revista/articole/an9nr1/7.%20Monica%20Gheorghe.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    working time; resting time; employee; employer; European jurisprudence.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • K31 - Law and Economics - - Other Substantive Areas of Law - - - Labor Law

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sja:journl:v:9:y:2020:i:1:p:58-64. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catalin-Silviu Sararu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ssjarea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.