IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Fiducia In The New Civil Code: An Example Of Vitalization By International Business Law Of The Relationship Between Romanian Law And Common Law

Listed author(s):
  • Luminita GHEORGHE


    (Law Faculty, Bucharest University, Attorney-at-law)

Registered author(s):

    Trusts have existed in common law systems as early as the Middle Ages, and European civil law systems were aware of its existence and also of the existence of Roman private law fiducia. Yet, civil law systems resisted for a long time the temptation of transposing trust or at least of developing Roman law fiducia. Romanian law, for instance, preferred, on the one hand, developing a series of case law solutions acknowledging the common law trust and, on the other hand, admitting a series of trust-like mechanisms, while assuming the role of defender of private law principles considered fundamental, such as the personal character of the patrimony and the exclusive and perpetual character of the ownership right. Such status quo was maintained for a long time, with the consequence of generating a static relationship between trust and Romanian fiducia, with trustee mechanisms being, however, developed under Romanian law. Conversely, upon the regulation of Romanian fiducia, we tend to overlook its fundamental convergence with the common law trust. The evolution of Romanian law with respect to trust is however not the consequence of trust’s proven utility; it is its forced answer to the dynamics of international business.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Article provided by Societatea de Stiinte Juridice si Administrative (Society of Juridical and Administrative Sciences) in its journal “Perspectives of Business Law” Journal.

    Volume (Year): 3 (2014)
    Issue (Month): 1 (December)
    Pages: 276-283

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:sja:journl:v:3:y:2014:i:1:p:276-283
    Contact details of provider: Postal:

    Phone: 0040-01-2112650
    Fax: 0040-01-3129549
    Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sja:journl:v:3:y:2014:i:1:p:276-283. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Catalin-Silviu Sararu)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.