Public Administration In A European Context. Case Study: Possibilities To Complete The Trial Period – Practice At National Level Versus Practice Of The European Union Civil Service Tribunal

As social policy is outlined and its objectives stated in the provisions of Article 151 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, both the Union and the member states must be responsible for respecting "fundamental social rights such as those stated in the European Social Charter signed in Turin on 18 October 1961 and in the Community Charter of Fundamental Social Rights of Workers adopted in 1989". In the light of these goals, we are concerned with an analysis aimed at a legal and fair promotion and harmonization of the procedure for filling positions at the public administration level, with an emphasis on the protection of social rights and the harmonization of good practices developed, in conditions of honest social protection and combating exclusion and discrimination of any kind. It is therefore necessary, at a theoretical level, to take it for granted that the Union and all its member states implement practices aimed at favoring the harmonization of social systems. Concretely, however, we find that the applied procedures neglect the approximation of the issued administrative documents and any kind of common methodology, as long as a report is not regulated or applied at the national level that reproduces the conclusions of the verification of the professional skills of the employee at the end of the trial period. We propose in this article a substantiated analysis of the methods of termination of trial periods, so that the termination of employment contracts concluded during the trial period exclusively through a written notification, without notice and without any motivation, is no longer the concern of the courts, because the court cannot verify the existence or not of the professional aptitude in the absence of the presentation of some arguments by the employer that aim to fulfill or not within reasonable terms the assigned duties, certain difficulties in the service relationship or the degree of accommodation with the administrative and hierarchical system.