IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sja/journ1/v2y2022i2p149-164.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Outlook of the European Court of Justice Regarding Comparative Advertising

Author

Listed:
  • Rodica Diana APAN

    (Faculty of Law of Cluj-Napoca, †Dimitrie Cantemir†Christian University, Romania)

Abstract

Advertising transcends the borders of the States and has an impact on the single market. Moreover, it may lead to distortions of competition. One purpose of regulating advertising stems from the imperatives of protecting consumers. They are the recipients of the advertising message and their interests can be harmed by advertising. Misleading advertising is prohibited, as is comparative advertising, in certain situations, in expressly determined hypotheses. The analysis in concreto of two such facts, in the reflection of the decisions given by the European Court of Justice, is the theme of this study. At the same time, we will analyze the sanctions regulated at national level in the event of committing the acts that constitute illicit comparative advertising, as well as the administrative bodies empowered to apply the sanctions in order to clean up the competitive environment.

Suggested Citation

  • Rodica Diana APAN, 2022. "Outlook of the European Court of Justice Regarding Comparative Advertising," International Investment Law Journal, Societatea de Stiinte Juridice si Administrative (Society of Juridical and Administrative Sciences), vol. 2(2), pages 149-164, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:sja:journ1:v:2:y:2022:i:2:p:149-164
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.investmentlaw.adjuris.ro/articole/An2v2/5.%20Diana%20Apan%20EN.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    advertising; misleading advertising; comparative advertising; administrative bodies; sanctions.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • K33 - Law and Economics - - Other Substantive Areas of Law - - - International Law
    • K41 - Law and Economics - - Legal Procedure, the Legal System, and Illegal Behavior - - - Litigation Process

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sja:journ1:v:2:y:2022:i:2:p:149-164. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catalin-Silviu Sararu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ssjarea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.