Author
Listed:
- Robert Dyrcz
(Fundacja Polski Instytut Credit Management, Polska)
- Artur Holda
(Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Krakowie, Polska)
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of this article is to introduce the methodology for creating a synthetic industry indicator of trade credit risk (PICM Risk Index©), which will be useful in forecasting the number of defaults in economic sectors. In particular, the PICM Risk Index© indicator is to be characterized by the smallest possible forecast error and is to be variable in monthly periods. Methodology: In the construction of the indicator, the economic situation research of the Central Statistical Office was used. The research hypotheses assumed were that the indicator shows a statistically significant relationship with insolvencies in the sectors of the economy, i.e. at least to a high degree in the meaning of the correlation classification according to Guilford. In the proposed methodology, the indicator shows greater effectiveness as a leading measure, i.e. the forecast error is the smallest for predictions one year in advance. Findings: The proposed indicator is highly or very highly correlated with industry default statistics. In addition, the PICM Risk Index© is characterized by a smaller forecast error for predicting the number of defaults one year in advance. Research limitations/implications: Forecasting corporate bankruptcy is a major challenge due to the considerable complexity of the conditions for conducting business activity and the dynamic variability of the micro- and macroeconomic environment. The selected input data in the construction of the proposed indicator, although commonly used due to their high cognitive value confirmed by numerous studies, are also criticized due to their nature referred to as “soft†(qualitative) data. Therefore, the topic discussed in the article should be the beginning of research to which a reasonable number of other input variables can be included. The article shows how generally available information can be the basis for building an effective and at the same time simple to construct credit risk assessment indicator for economic sectors. Saving time in the process of holistic credit analysis and the accuracy of the assessment are also significant. Both of these factors can be the subject of separate analyses, but there is no doubt that they are very important for credit analysis practitioners. Originality/value: The article identifies two areas of research gap and proposes an indicator PICM Risk Index©, which in its presented form has not yet functioned in Polish and international realities. The indicator is a very effective element of a holistic credit analysis, supplementing the credit analysis of a single enterprise with a measure of the risk of the industry in which the enterprise operates. Methodology: In the construction of the indicator, the economic situation research of the Central Statistical Office was used. The research hypotheses assumed were that the indicator shows a statistically significant relationship with insolvencies in the sectors of the economy, i.e. at least to a high degree in the meaning of the correlation classification according to J. Guilford. In the proposed methodology, the indicator shows greater effectiveness as a leading measure, i.e. the forecast error is the smallest for predictions one year in advance. Findings: The proposed indicator is highly or very highly correlated with industry default statistics. In addition, the PICM Risk Index© is characterized by a smaller forecast error for predicting the number of defaults one year in advance. Research limitations/implications: Forecasting corporate bankruptcy is a major challenge due to the considerable complexity of the conditions for conducting business activity and the dynamic variability of the micro- and macroeconomic environment. The selected input data in the construction of the proposed indicator, although commonly used due to their high cognitive value confirmed by numerous studies, are also criticized due to their nature referred to as "soft" (qualitative) data. Therefore, the topic discussed in the article should be the beginning of research to which a reasonable number of other input variables can be included. The article shows how generally available information can be the basis for building an effective and at the same time simple to construct credit risk assessment indicator for economic sectors. Saving time in the process of holistic credit analysis and the accuracy of the assessment are also significant. Both of these factors can be the subject of separate analyses, but there is no doubt that they are very important for credit analysis practitioners. Originality/value: The article identifies two areas of research gap and proposes an indicator PICM Risk Index©, which in its presented form has not yet functioned in Polish and international realities. The indicator is a very effective element of a holistic credit analysis, supplementing the credit analysis of a single enterprise with a measure of the risk of the industry in which the enterprise operates.
Suggested Citation
Robert Dyrcz & Artur Holda, 2025.
"Wykorzystanie branzowego wskaznika ryzyka kredytu kupieckiego w polskich realiach gospodarczych w latach 2013–2023,"
Research Reports, University of Warsaw, Faculty of Management, vol. 2(43), pages 94-120.
Handle:
RePEc:sgm:resrep:v:2:i:43:y:2025:p:94-120
DOI: 10.7172/1733-9758.2025.43.7
Download full text from publisher
More about this item
Keywords
;
;
;
;
;
JEL classification:
- C51 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric Modeling - - - Model Construction and Estimation
- C52 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric Modeling - - - Model Evaluation, Validation, and Selection
- C53 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric Modeling - - - Forecasting and Prediction Models; Simulation Methods
- C55 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric Modeling - - - Large Data Sets: Modeling and Analysis
- G33 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Bankruptcy; Liquidation
Statistics
Access and download statistics
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sgm:resrep:v:2:i:43:y:2025:p:94-120. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/somuwpl.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.