IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sgm/pzwzuw/v17i84y2019p9-23.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Grand Challenges: A Way Out of the Ivory Tower for Management Academic Discipline (Wielkie wyzwania: droga wyjscia z „wiezy z kosci sloniowej” zarzadzania jako dyscypliny akademickiej)

Author

Listed:
  • Wojciech Czakon

    (Institute of Economics, Finance and Management, Jagiellonian University in Kraków)

Abstract

The academic discipline of management has a long and successful history of legitimacy building. Concerns about scientific rigor have brought major improvements in research, publication, and teaching practices. However, the established academic status fosters a rigor-relevance gap emerging between researchers and managers. Scholars are confined in metaphorical “ivory towers” of scientific rigor and orientation toward an academic audience, which disconnects the discipline from management practice. Consequently, both the social legitimacy of management academia and its development prospects are threatened. This study argues that management has a predilection to solving grand societal challenges, thus contributing both to social progress and discipline development. Three overarching grand challenges are outlined and linked to management challenges. By taking the lens of scientific legitimacy stemming from methodology, this study identifies how management methodology can be usefully developed.

Suggested Citation

  • Wojciech Czakon, 2019. "Grand Challenges: A Way Out of the Ivory Tower for Management Academic Discipline (Wielkie wyzwania: droga wyjscia z „wiezy z kosci sloniowej” zarzadzania jako dyscypliny akademickiej)," Problemy Zarzadzania, University of Warsaw, Faculty of Management, vol. 17(84), pages 9-23.
  • Handle: RePEc:sgm:pzwzuw:v:17:i:84:y:2019:p:9-23
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://pz.wz.uw.edu.pl/resources/html/article/details?id=197164
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://pz.wz.uw.edu.pl/en
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    methodology; rigor; grand challenge; legitimacy;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M00 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - General - - - General
    • N01 - Economic History - - General - - - Development of the Discipline: Historiographical; Sources and Methods

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sgm:pzwzuw:v:17:i:84:y:2019:p:9-23. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/somuwpl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.