IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sen/journl/v12i3y2011p236-260.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Competition and Technology Adoption in Two-Sided Network Markets

Author

Listed:
  • S.K. Majumdar

Abstract

Investment in the face of entry has been a strategy used by incumbents firms. Nevertheless, the concept applies to traditional sectors of industry and not for contemporary network contexts. This article reports a study that has examined the strategic behavior of the incumbent local exchange carriers in the United States telecommunications with respect to technology investments in the face of competitive entry over a fourteen year period, 1988 to 2001. The general finding is that in the face of competitive entry the incumbents underinvested in broadband technology, an approach consistent with desires to constrain entry or reflecting an inability or unwillingness to supply unbundled network services at low rates. The possibilities of inter-modal cable competition also led to underinvestment of broadband, which could be made potentially obsolete by cable companies, but positive investments in digital technologies. Controlling for firm-specific behavior, in the post-1996 period, after the Telecommunications Act was passed, it was noted that the Bell operating companies displayed positive investment patterns. The evidence displays interesting dynamics at work in the investment behavior of telecommunications firms as the market has become competitive.

Suggested Citation

  • S.K. Majumdar, 2011. "Competition and Technology Adoption in Two-Sided Network Markets," Competition and Regulation in Network Industries, Intersentia, vol. 12(3), pages 236-260, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:sen:journl:v:12:i:3:y:2011:p:236-260
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Majumdar, Sumit K., 2016. "Debt and communications technology diffusion: Retrospective evidence," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(2), pages 458-474.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sen:journl:v:12:i:3:y:2011:p:236-260. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Petra Van den Bempt (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.crninet.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.