Author
Abstract
Обсуждается научная программа, парадигма и место в экономической науке исторической школы. Показано, что в экономической литературе существуют диаметрально противоположные точки зрения на значение исследований в рамках этого направления для развития экономической мысли как в прошлом, так и в настоящем. Описаны принципиальные расхождения между представителями исторической школы и классической политической экономии. Проанализированы и обобщены взгляды разных авторов на содержание исследовательской программы и парадигмы исторической школы. Выявлены отличительные черты исследований в рамках данного направления и показано, что их нельзя смешивать с эмпирическими или историко-экономическими исследованиями, которые могут проводиться и рамках альтернативных подходов. Описаны некоторые достижения исторической школы, которые широко используются в других направлениях науки и/или ставшие общепризнанными. Предложены дополнительные аргументы для обоснования преемственности и взаимовлияния между исторической школой, марксизмом и старым американским институционализмом. The paper discusses a scientific program and paradigm of the historical school as well as the role it plays in economics and shows that there are diametrically opposite viewpoints on how studies of this research area has impacted on the development of economic thoughts in the past and what impacts can be observed today. It also describes the principle differences between historical school’s representatives and those of classical economics; analyzes how different authors understand the notions of the scientific program and paradigm of the historical school; the specifics of the studies of this research area and concludes that it is not worth confusing such studies with historical or economical ones as they could be done within the framework of the alternative approaches. The paper presents the achievements of historical school, which are universally recognized or/and widely applied by the different branches of science and new arguments in favor of the continuity and mutual influence of historical school, Marxism, and old American institutionalism .
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
More about this item
Keywords
;
;
;
;
;
;
;
;
;
;
;
;
;
;
;
;
JEL classification:
- B15 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - History of Economic Thought through 1925 - - - Historical; Institutional; Evolutionary
Statistics
Access and download statistics
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:scn:guhrje:2014_4_14. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Виталия Маркова (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://socionet.ru/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.