Author
Abstract
Принятие управленческого решения должно основываться на максимально объективном знании текущей ситуации. Сегодня в России наблюдается существенный дисбаланс в обеспечении информацией органов власти различных уровней (федерального, регионального и местного). Цель данного исследования заключается в выявлении и описании основных фактических способов получения информации о муниципалитете органами местного самоуправления (в связи с правовыми ограничениями данной деятельности), а также выявлении их преимуществ и недостатков, определении основных факторов, порождающих информационную асимметрию. Полученные в процессе полевого исследования результаты позволяют сформулировать предложения по совершенствованию качества статистических данных и улучшению информационно-статистического обеспечения муниципальных образований. Предлагается усиление роли ведомственной и муниципальной статистик в формировании официальных статистических данных, внедрение практик внутри- и межведомственного обмена информацией. Decision-making should be based on the most comprehensive knowledge of the current situation. There is a significant imbalance in the different government levels (federal, regional and municipal) information provision in Russia nowadays. The primary aim of the investigation is to identify and describe the main practical methods of getting information about the municipality by local authorities (which are important due to the existence of legal restrictions of such activity) and to reveal its advantages and disadvantages, to determine the basic factors that generate information asymmetry. Conducted field research has provided the results which allow us to develop the proposals of improving the quality of statistical data and enhancing the informational and statistical basis of local self-government. It is suggested to strengthen the role of municipal and departmental statistical data in the official statistics formation and to implement the practices of intra- and interdepartmental information exchange.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
More about this item
Keywords
;
;
;
;
;
;
;
;
;
;
;
;
JEL classification:
- H - Public Economics
- H - Public Economics
- H - Public Economics
- H - Public Economics
Statistics
Access and download statistics
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:scn:guhrje:2014_4_10. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Виталия Маркова (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://socionet.ru/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.