IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/scn/financ/y2019i6p6-25.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Сравнительный анализ ICO, DAOICO, IEO и STO. Практический ситуационный анализ // Comparative Analysis of ICO, DAOICO, IEO and STO. Case Study

Author

Listed:
  • A. Myalo S.

    (National Research University Higher School of Economics)

  • А. Мяло C.

    (Национальный исследовательский университет «Высшая школа экономики»)

Abstract

The article examines the problem of the ICO (Initial Coin Offering, from English — “initial offer of coins, initial placement of coins”). The information source is the ICO rating data of the return on investment in blockchain startups. The methodological base of the research is a situational comparative analysis of the ICO, DAOICO, IEO and STO and systematization of information. The author analyzes three new ICO models. The first one includes elements of Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAO). Its aim is to minimize the difficulties and risks associated with the ICO. The second model (Initial Exchange Offering (IEO), from English — “primary exchange offer”) is designed to minimize risks, liquidity problems and a delay in listing tokens at the end of the token sale. The third model — the Security Token Offering (STO, from English — “offer of security token”) — was designed to support real assets and comply with the SEC requirements. These models are a new direction for small and medium enterprises and investors. The absence of any scientific work emphasizes the relevance and scientific novelty of the study. The article is a follow-up of the empirical work related to the success of the ICO, as well as the basis for its revision using the case study results. Исследуется проблема ICO (от англ. Initial Coin Offering — первичное предложение монет, первичное размещение монет). Информационная основа — данные рейтинга ICO криптовалют о рентабельности инвестиций в блокчейн-стартапы. Методологическая база исследования — ситуационный сравнительный анализ ICO, DAOICO, IEO и STO и систематизация информации. Автор анализирует три новых модели ICO. Первая включает в себя элементы децентрализованных автономных организаций (ДАО), ее цель — сокращение трудностей и рисков, связанных с ICO. Вторая (от англ. Initial Exchange Offering (IEO) — первичное биржевое предложение) призвана минимизировать риски, проблемы с ликвидностью и отсрочку листинга токенов на конечном этапе их продажи. Третья — Security Token Offering (от англ. STO— предложение токена — ценной бумаги) создана для поддержки реальных активов и соблюдения требований SEC. Эти модели являются новым объектом внимания для малых и средних предприятий и инвесторов. Отсутствие каких-либо научных работ по этой теме подчеркивает актуальность и научную новизну исследования. Статья — логическое продолжение эмпирической работы, касающейся успеха ICO, а также основа для ее пересмотра с учетом результатов практического ситуационного анализа.

Suggested Citation

  • A. Myalo S. & А. Мяло C., 2019. "Сравнительный анализ ICO, DAOICO, IEO и STO. Практический ситуационный анализ // Comparative Analysis of ICO, DAOICO, IEO and STO. Case Study," Финансы: теория и практика/Finance: Theory and Practice // Finance: Theory and Practice, ФГОБУВО Финансовый университет при Правительстве Российской Федерации // Financial University under The Government of Russian Federation, vol. 23(6), pages 6-25.
  • Handle: RePEc:scn:financ:y:2019:i:6:p:6-25
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://financetp.fa.ru/jour/article/viewFile/924/613.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://financetp.fa.ru/jour/article/viewFile/924/623.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    G30; G39; ICO; DAICO; IEO; STO; investment; case study; ICO; DAICO; IEO; STO; инвестиции; практический ситуационный анализ;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G30 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - General
    • G39 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Other

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:scn:financ:y:2019:i:6:p:6-25. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Алексей Скалабан (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://financetp.fa.ru .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.