IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/
MyIDEAS: Login to save this article or follow this journal

Стратегии Институциональных Реформ. Перспективные Траектории

  • Полтерович В.М.

Статья представляет собой первую часть работы, посвященной проблеме выбора стратегии институциональной реформы. Под стратегией понимается планируемая траектория изменения институтов во времени. Рассматриваются три типа стратегий: шоковая терапия, выращивание, стратегия промежуточных институтов. Вводится понятие перспективной траектории -имеющей высокие шансы на успех благодаря выполнению определенных требований. Перспективная траектория должна быть согласована с ресурсными, технологическими и институциональными ограничениями и предусматривать встроенные механизмы, стимулирующие запланированные изменения институтов и предотвращающие возникновение дисфункций и институциональных ловушек. В частности, перспективная траектория должна принимать во внимание особенности гражданской культуры и политический механизм принятия решений о реформах, учитывать статическую и динамическую комплементарность институтов, сдерживать перераспределительную активность и предусматривать компенсации тем, кто мог бы проиграть в результате реформенных мероприятий. Необходимо, чтобы институциональные изменения поддерживались мерами по формированию благоприятных институциональных ожиданий и государственной политикой стимулирования роста. Во второй части работы (Полтерович, 2006) предлагаемый аналитический аппарат будет использован для сопоставления реформ в Китае и России.

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

Article provided by Центральный Экономико-Математический Институт (ЦЭМИ) in its journal Экономика и математические методы.

Volume (Year): 42 (2006)
Issue (Month): 1 (январь)
Pages:

as
in new window

Handle: RePEc:scn:cememm:42-1-1
Note: Москва
Contact details of provider: Web page: http://www.cemi.rssi.ru/emm/home.htm

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

as in new window
  1. Sato, Kazuo, 1990. "Indicative planning in Japan," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 14(4), pages 625-647, December.
  2. Daron Acemoglu & Philippe Aghion & Fabrizio Zilibotti, 2002. "Vertical Integration and Distance to Frontier," NBER Working Papers 9191, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
  3. Rodrik, Dani & Subramanian, Arvind & Trebbi, Francesco, 2002. "Institutions Rule: The Primacy of Institutions Over Geography and Integration in Economic Development," CEPR Discussion Papers 3643, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
  4. Daniel Berkowitz & Katharina Pistor & Jean-Francois Richard, 2000. "Economic Development, Legality, and the Transplant Effect," William Davidson Institute Working Papers Series 308, William Davidson Institute at the University of Michigan.
  5. Simon Johnson & Daniel Kaufman & Andrei Shleifer, 1997. "The Unofficial Economy in Transition," Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Economic Studies Program, The Brookings Institution, vol. 28(2), pages 159-240.
  6. Aron, Janine, 2000. "Growth and Institutions: A Review of the Evidence," World Bank Research Observer, World Bank Group, vol. 15(1), pages 99-135, February.
  7. Yingyi Qian, 1999. "The Institutional Foundations of China's Market Transition," Working Papers 99011, Stanford University, Department of Economics.
  8. Hillman, Arye L. & Swank, Otto, 2000. "Why political culture should be in the lexicon of economics," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 16(1), pages 1-4, March.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:scn:cememm:42-1-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Sergei Parinov)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.