IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sbr/abstra/v62y2010i3p291-316.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Role of Argument and Narration in Knowledge Sharing: Coping with Context, Validity, and Coherence

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel Geiger

Abstract

This paper examines the way knowledge is shared within organizations. Although current research identifies narratives as an important medium for organizational knowledge sharing because they serve as sensemaking devices and collective memory, the study shows that narrative-based knowledge sharing encounters serious shortcomings and must frequently be supplemented by an argumentative mode of communication. Furthermore, the conditions that trigger a switch from a narrative to an argumentative mode of communication are specified. Doing so clarifies the limitations of a narrative mode of knowledge sharing and provides a more sophisticated understanding of the communication strategies that are used in virtual communities.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel Geiger, 2010. "The Role of Argument and Narration in Knowledge Sharing: Coping with Context, Validity, and Coherence," Schmalenbach Business Review (sbr), LMU Munich School of Management, vol. 62(3), pages 291-316, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:sbr:abstra:v:62:y:2010:i:3:p:291-316
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.vhb.de/sbr/pdfarchive.html
    Download Restriction: no

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Argumentation; Knowledge Sharing; Narratives; Problems of Narratives.;

    JEL classification:

    • M10 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sbr:abstra:v:62:y:2010:i:3:p:291-316. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (sbr). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/fbmunde.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.