IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/woemps/v36y2022i6p1097-1117.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Staying Down with the Joneses: Differences in the Psychological Cost of Unemployment across Neighbourhoods

Author

Listed:
  • Peter Howley

    (University of Leeds, UK)

  • Sarah Knight

    (University of York, UK)

Abstract

This article demonstrates how the unemployment of neighbours can ameliorate the psychological costs of unemployment. In support of this premise, we find that while unemployment is always harmful, the gap in psychological well-being between employed and unemployed individuals is much less in relatively high unemployment neighbourhoods (particularly so for males and relatively older cohorts). Our proposed explanation is that people employ close points of social comparison with the result that any feelings of shame or embarrassment associated with unemployment are mitigated when surrounded by unemployed neighbours. One potentially important labour market implication of these findings is that it may be more difficult than anticipated to transition some people out of unemployment in high unemployment neighbourhoods. Apart from highlighting the place-specific nature of the relationship between unemployment and psychological well-being, our findings also highlight the importance of non-pecuniary factors, such as the social norm to work, in explaining the substantive negative psychological impact of unemployment.

Suggested Citation

  • Peter Howley & Sarah Knight, 2022. "Staying Down with the Joneses: Differences in the Psychological Cost of Unemployment across Neighbourhoods," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 36(6), pages 1097-1117, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:woemps:v:36:y:2022:i:6:p:1097-1117
    DOI: 10.1177/09500170211003483
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/09500170211003483
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/09500170211003483?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:woemps:v:36:y:2022:i:6:p:1097-1117. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.britsoc.co.uk/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.