IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/woemps/v34y2020i2p281-298.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Constant Caregiver: Work–family Spillover among Men and Women in Nursing

Author

Listed:
  • Marci D Cottingham

    (University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands)

  • Jamie J Chapman

    (Westminster College, USA)

  • Rebecca J Erickson

    (University of Akron, USA)

Abstract

Work–family spillover is a central concept in the work and occupations literature, with prior research detailing its negative outcomes and gendered dimensions. With increased demands for careworkers and more men entering occupations such as nursing, we examine experiences and perceptions of spillover using qualitative data from a diverse sample of 48 US nurses. We find similarities across men and women in terms of exhaustion and stress as well as in anticipating spillover in their careers. Yet, we also find some differences, with men (but not women) highlighting the transfer of emotional capital between work and family. We extend work–family research by broadening the concept of spillover to include its anticipation and the transfer of emotional capital – both aspects that have been previously under-examined. These findings have implications for the retention and support of careworkers and refine the concept of spillover in ways that could apply to various employment sectors.

Suggested Citation

  • Marci D Cottingham & Jamie J Chapman & Rebecca J Erickson, 2020. "The Constant Caregiver: Work–family Spillover among Men and Women in Nursing," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 34(2), pages 281-298, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:woemps:v:34:y:2020:i:2:p:281-298
    DOI: 10.1177/0950017019885084
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0950017019885084
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0950017019885084?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ellen Galinsky & Kerstin Aumann & James T. Bond, 2013. "Times are Changing: Gender and Generation at Work and at Home in the USA," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Steven Poelmans & Jeffrey H. Greenhaus & Mireia Las Heras Maestro (ed.), Expanding the Boundaries of Work-Family Research, chapter 13, pages 279-296, Palgrave Macmillan.
    2. Constanze Leineweber & Hugo Westerlund & Holendro Singh Chungkham & Rikard Lindqvist & Sara Runesdotter & Carol Tishelman, 2014. "Nurses' Practice Environment and Work-Family Conflict in Relation to Burn Out: A Multilevel Modelling Approach," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(5), pages 1-9, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maxime Vachon & Marie Papineau & Gilles Dupuis & Pasquale Roberge, 2019. "Associations Between Systemic Quality of Life and Burnout Among French Canadian Workers," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 142(3), pages 1193-1210, April.
    2. Gahye Hong & Eunmi Kim, 2019. "How to Attract Talented Expatriates: The Key Role of Sustainable HRM," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-13, September.
    3. Duffy, Sarah & van Esch, Patrick & Yousef, Murooj, 2020. "Increasing parental leave uptake: A systems social marketing approach," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 28(2), pages 110-118.
    4. Lei Huang & Ya Wang & Hao Huang, 2021. "Factors associated with family cohesion and adaptability among Chinese registered nurses," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(1-2), pages 113-125, January.
    5. Jaeseung Kim, 2020. "Workplace Flexibility and Parent–Child Interactions Among Working Parents in the U.S," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 151(2), pages 427-469, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:woemps:v:34:y:2020:i:2:p:281-298. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.britsoc.co.uk/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.