IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/woemps/v22y2008i4p695-712.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Role redesign in the National Health Service

Author

Listed:
  • Julie Prowse

    (Bradford University, j.prowse@bradford.ac.uk)

  • Peter Prowse

    (University of Bradford, p.j.prowse@bradford.ac.uk)

Abstract

This article examines the effects of role redesign on the work and professional boundaries of midwives employed in the National Health Service. It outlines midwives' views and experiences of attempts to change their skills and professional boundaries and, using the concept of closure, considers the implications for the midwifery profession. The findings show that role redesign is changing midwives' work and that the traditional emotional, social and caring skills associated with a midwife are being undermined by the growth in technical work. Importantly, midwives' attempts to use closure have met with limited success and aspects of their work which they enjoy are being delegated to maternity support workers, while midwives' roles expand to include work traditionally performed by doctors. Midwives' concerns about the implications of work redesign for maternity care and their professional boundaries reflect the uncertainty surrounding the profession about the future role and skills of a midwife.

Suggested Citation

  • Julie Prowse & Peter Prowse, 2008. "Role redesign in the National Health Service," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 22(4), pages 695-712, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:woemps:v:22:y:2008:i:4:p:695-712
    DOI: 10.1177/0950017008096743
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0950017008096743
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0950017008096743?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bassett, Ken L. & Iyer, Nitya & Kazanjian, Arminee, 2000. "Defensive medicine during hospital obstetrical care: a by-product of the technological age," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 51(4), pages 523-537, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tully, Kristin P. & Ball, Helen L., 2013. "Misrecognition of need: Women's experiences of and explanations for undergoing cesarean delivery," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 103-111.
    2. Beomsoo Kim, 2007. "The Impact of Malpractice Risk on the Use of Obstetrics Procedures," The Journal of Legal Studies, University of Chicago Press, vol. 36(S2), pages 79-119, June.
    3. Simmons, Rebecca K. & Singh, Gita & Maconochie, Noreen & Doyle, Pat & Green, Judith, 2006. "Experience of miscarriage in the UK: Qualitative findings from the National Women's Health Study," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 63(7), pages 1934-1946, October.
    4. Smith-Oka, Vania, 2022. "Cutting Women: Unnecessary cesareans as iatrogenesis and obstetric violence," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 296(C).
    5. Roth, Louise Marie, 2023. "Defensive versus evidence-based medical technology: Liability risk and electronic fetal monitoring in low-risk births," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 317(C).
    6. Livio Garattini & Anna Padula, 2020. "Defensive medicine in Europe: a ‘full circle’?," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 21(4), pages 477-482, June.
    7. Livio Garattini & Anna Padula, 2020. "Defensive medicine in Europe: a ‘full circle’?," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 21(2), pages 165-170, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:woemps:v:22:y:2008:i:4:p:695-712. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.britsoc.co.uk/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.