IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/urbstu/v59y2022i7p1372-1388.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reclaiming Hong Kong through neighbourhood-making: A study of the 2019 Anti-ELAB movement

Author

Listed:
  • Yao-Tai Li

    (Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong)

  • Katherine Whitworth

    (The University of Sydney, Australia)

Abstract

Set in the context of the 2019 Anti-Extradition Law Amendment Bill (Anti-ELAB) protest movement in Hong Kong, this study focuses on selected material and social appropriations of space including community-focused events held in shopping malls, the establishment of networks connecting consumers to suppliers with like-minded political values, and human chains. Drawing on popular concepts such as scale, network and place-frames found in the literature on contentious politics, we argue that the place-making practices observed during the period of study became claim-making practices that effectively framed movement aims and projected movement claims beyond the neighbourhood scale into a dynamic contestation at the city and national scales. Adopting key elements of neighbourhood as defined by Jenks and Dempsey, we highlight that the socio-spatial practices of the Anti-ELAB protests not only re-cast city spaces into neighbourhood spaces but also redefined traditional understandings of neighbourhood as a socio-spatial construct. We argue that during the Anti-ELAB movement an ‘ideological neighbourhood’ emerged in which spatial relationality is not borne out through physical proximity. Instead, connections between functional and social units were established through ideological affinity. These new connections and the replication of neighbourhood-based practices reinforced the construction of a socially and politically distinct Hong Kong identity. We extend the literatures on contentious politics and urban sociology by showing that the ideology and the imaginaries of movement participants can become spatially manifest and thus defensible in the physical world through new territorialities such as the neighbourhood.

Suggested Citation

  • Yao-Tai Li & Katherine Whitworth, 2022. "Reclaiming Hong Kong through neighbourhood-making: A study of the 2019 Anti-ELAB movement," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 59(7), pages 1372-1388, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:59:y:2022:i:7:p:1372-1388
    DOI: 10.1177/00420980211014448
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00420980211014448
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/00420980211014448?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alasdair Jones, 2021. "Public realm ethnography: (Non-)Participation, co-presence and the challenge of situated multiplicity," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(2), pages 425-440, February.
    2. Wendy Kellogg, 1999. "Community-based Organizations and Neighbourhood Environmental Problem Solving: A Framework for Adoption of Information Technologies," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(4), pages 445-469.
    3. Luc Anselin & Sarah Williams, 2016. "Digital neighborhoods," Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(4), pages 305-328, October.
    4. Jihyun Kim, 2019. "Designing multiple urban space: an actor-network theory analysis on multiplicity and stability of public space," Journal of Urban Design, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(2), pages 249-268, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Levi J Wolf & Elijah Knaap & Sergio Rey, 2021. "Geosilhouettes: Geographical measures of cluster fit," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 48(3), pages 521-539, March.
    2. Rolf Bergs & Rüdiger Budde, 2022. "The potential of small-scale spatial data in regional science," Review of Regional Research: Jahrbuch für Regionalwissenschaft, Springer;Gesellschaft für Regionalforschung (GfR), vol. 42(2), pages 97-110, August.
    3. Jianxiang Huang & Yuming Cui & Lishuai Li & Mengdi Guo & Hung Chak Ho & Yi Lu & Chris Webster, 2023. "Re-examining Jane Jacobs’ doctrine using new urban data in Hong Kong," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 50(1), pages 76-93, January.
    4. Bingley, Scott & Burgess, Stephen, 2012. "A case analysis of the adoption of Internet applications by local sporting bodies in New Zealand," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 11-16.
    5. Bradley Rink, 2023. "Public space on the move: Mediating mobility, stillness and encounter on a Cape Town bus," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 60(15), pages 3027-3044, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:59:y:2022:i:7:p:1372-1388. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.gla.ac.uk/departments/urbanstudiesjournal .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.