IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/urbstu/v59y2022i14p2968-2984.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The ethical underpinnings of Smart City governance: Decision-making in the Smart Cambridge programme, UK

Author

Listed:
  • Richmond Juvenile Ehwi

    (University of Cambridge, UK)

  • Hannah Holmes

    (University of Cambridge, UK)

  • Sabina Maslova

    (University of Cambridge, UK)

  • Gemma Burgess

    (University of Cambridge, UK)

Abstract

As Smart Cities have become more widespread, so too have concerns about their associated ethical issues. However, ethical debates in the current Smart City literature have tended to focus on issues related to the collection, processing, usage, storage and sharing of data. This paper argues that ethical debates should be extended to capture crucial decisions taken as part of Smart City governance, and the ethical references which underpin them. Using the Smart Cambridge programme as a case study, this paper draws empirical data from interviews with experts and actors involved in the programme, and highlights the ethical nature of decisions taken in key aspects of Smart City governance. The paper reveals that city officials and programme managers demonstrate acute consciousness of legal regulations, which they employ in decision-making, and are less cognisant of governance principles based on norms and values which are also drawn upon. This paper argues that there is nonetheless ethical content which can be traced in decision-making, regardless of whether ethical concerns are explicitly recognised as such.

Suggested Citation

  • Richmond Juvenile Ehwi & Hannah Holmes & Sabina Maslova & Gemma Burgess, 2022. "The ethical underpinnings of Smart City governance: Decision-making in the Smart Cambridge programme, UK," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 59(14), pages 2968-2984, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:59:y:2022:i:14:p:2968-2984
    DOI: 10.1177/00420980211064983
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00420980211064983
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/00420980211064983?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:59:y:2022:i:14:p:2968-2984. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.gla.ac.uk/departments/urbanstudiesjournal .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.